Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on monero.town

10 replies

It usually doesn’t benefit the shareholders either. Something like 80% of all M&A activity is considered a general failure.

Projected “synergies” never come to fruition because employees on both sides are handled poorly in the transaction. A firm’s capabilities only exist because of its employees; when they all leave, most of the value goes with them.

1
monero.town

I think some things can be beneficial to customers. For example, with the T-Mobile and Sprint merger, we got a ton more spectrum, and so speeds are super fast now. And we also got the T-Mobile Connect plans, which is what I use.

1
Takreply
lemmy.ml

There's lots of things like Google where ubiquity provides simplicity and speed but it also creates a terrible dilemma if the share holder ever has a desire to make profit at the expense of the userbase. So it might be beneficial for now or there might be a silver lining but there is no promise it will always be that way.

In the end T-Mobile is driven by profits not your happiness and if at any point your unhappiness becomes profitable you're out of options.

1

Ugh, we're going to be left with like 5 syndicate corporations that own and run the entire world.

3
lemmy.ml

I need to exit mint. What's the next option? Something that is not republic wireless or Google Fi, sprint, att, etc asshole companies. Is there anything else out there?

1
monero.town

Not really, Republic is an MVNO of Verizon. Mint is an MVNO of T-Mobile. Cricket is an MVNO of AT&T. I guess you could go with Dish, but that's laughable.

2

You reached the end