Second line
I was quite impressed with the Dach/Slafkoský/Newhook line, and I think they deserve a fair shot together. Sure their defensive play needs to be tightened, but I think this could be something interesting.
What do you guys think?
Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.
View original on sh.itjust.worksI was quite impressed with the Dach/Slafkoský/Newhook line, and I think they deserve a fair shot together. Sure their defensive play needs to be tightened, but I think this could be something interesting.
What do you guys think?
4 replies
They were doing really well. It's good to see slaf progressing, he's come a long way from his first couple games last year.
Now to just get the team to play a whole game more consistently. Our second period is always a struggle for some reason.
Yeah, the second period has been kryptonite for some time.
A quick change of subject: what did you think of pairing Guhle with Kovacevic, and Matheson with Savard?
I thought Matheson and Kovacevic had good games, but I didn't really see much from Savard and Guhle. Which is surprising because Guhle normally puts on a pretty good show. Or maybe wifi just stole all the spotlight that I didn't notice the rest of the defense.
It seemed a bit odd to have the pairings like that. You'd think they would pair older and younger d together to combine experience and energy. Having Matheson and Savard seems like the old man line.
What about you?
Yeah, I thought it was strange to pair Matheson and Savard together; not sure they should stay together for too long, but I can’t say they worked poorly together. But then again, it’s the first game of the season, so I might get proven wrong.
I think Guhle benefits from a mobile partner in general, but I am not convinced Kovacevic is the right person for him. We’ll have to wait and see.