Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.ca

7 replies

lemmy.ca

Seems straightforward to me. It's pretty typical to permit testimony from those who were directly victimized. It's also pretty typical to permit impact statements from those indirectly victimized.

25

Exactly what I was thinking. This just sounds like it would be a victim impact statement which serves very standard.

I also fail to see how it could possibly be considered irrelevant.

17

I think it would depend on what they're trying to charge him with.

4

I love when people who apparently work as writers get stuff like if/whether wrong.

Okay, I don't: they should know better.

3

You reached the end

Judge to decide if Ottawa locals can testify in ‘Freedom Convoy’ organizers’ trial | Spyke