Spyke
sh.itjust.works

They all suck. also arent there only 2 browsers, chrome and firefox?

2

There are a few other browsers on that test that aren't chromium based other than Firefox, Safari (WebKit), Tor, and Mullvad (pretty sure they use Tor)

2
nickreply
sh.itjust.works

i mean kinda, cause all that s listed there is either chromium or gecko based which is just chrome and firefox on an elementary level and yes i do know this is just a joke

1
sh.itjust.works

These results surprise me quite a bit. I may have to reconsider my stance on Brave. I’ve just been using Firefox as I distrust Chrome, regardless of its skin. This makes it seem that Brave is doing a lot more under the hood to protect your privacy than I would have thought possible.

1
viridianreply
sh.itjust.works

The results surprised me too. I wonder how the results would look like if they tested a hardened version of Firefox like Arkenfox

5
viridianreply
sh.itjust.works

Ngl I forgot that librewolf is also hardened Firefox. The arkenfox devs say that librewolf and arkenfox are almost identical (scroll down to v97), so I guess they would have basically the same results on this test

3
Gone Quillreply
sh.itjust.works

My objections to brave have less to do with privacy concerns and more to do with concerns that I have giving Google full license to be who develops the blink engine and determine the future of the web

5

You reached the end

Open-source tests of web browser privacy | Spyke