amazon anti union posters put up by the company
cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/1011094
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.
The original was posted on /r/aboringdystopia by /u/bisexualbestfriend on 2023-10-04 15:06:06.
1226
Comments144
These posters make me want to organize.
It tells me that they think paying for graphics, ads etc are just a fraction of what I can gain.
I suspect that’s why it’s hanging right above the fingerprint/face scanner punchcard kiosk.
Email the IWW, they'll give you manuals.
Part of a union already UC system. They helped us get additional sick hours and pay during COVID. Plus additional time off.
Expanding the connections of the labor movement is never a bad thing. You never know when you'll need help from a steel workers union, teamsters, etc.
Never forget: If a company doesn't want you to have it, it's probably a good for you.
It really is that simple.
Most companies don't want you to drink cyanide, but it isn't good for you. Most companies don't want you getting hurt on the job. Most companies don't want you drinking or doing drugs while using heavy equipment. All these things arent good for you.
I'm not saying to unionize or not, but the logic is fallacious.
My union got me more money in a single year than I will pay in dues for my entire career in at least 3 separate years in the 6 years I've been working for my employer.
I get leave each year that is slightly more than 20 percent of my work hours.
Unions are amazing for workers.
My family is from West Virginia. They literally had battles for unions. Unions saved the state for a little while. Everyone I know there is also very anti-union. I don't know how. This is why history is important, but they won't teach you these parts of history in school.
The fact they are putting these up should let you know it's something you want to join
Agree. I don't understand why Amazon thinks this will help, like "hello people, Union is a thing that we're really afraid of, haven't you heard?"
People are so used to getting gaslit by megacorps, they just eat that shit up unquestioned
Because they want to plant that seed of doubt and fear.
Might not work for you, but unfortunately there are a lot of naive or insecure folks out there.
I do feel like this is smart. The first two points are whatever but the third one "typically you must go through union instead of your supervisor or manager" makes it sound like there is a lot of bureaucratic overhead to it. People who are undecided could feel that it's too much effort.
If you can think critically, sure. But large amounts of the population are dumb as bricks and will believe this literally just because it's on a poster.
Don't trust unions - they can't guarantee you benefits. Trust us, we guarantee the most exploitative conditions as long as you don't organise!
That sarcasm is incredably subtle. Those on reddit tricked/paid to promote that sentiment would include your first sentence almost verbatim.
Divided you beg. United you bargain.
Absolutely true, godspeed my friend
Oops, you replied to the wrong post. Whatever client your on, you can switch to a diffrent one easly. Hopefully it makes your life a little easier.
What?
This is what I would call insanity:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/edwardsegal/2022/10/24/amazon-responds-to-release-of-leaked-documents-showing-150-annual-employee-turnover/?sh=3057171d1d0b
How is this even legal? As a European I can't understand how anyone falls for this blatant anti-union propaganda. They are obviously beneficial to workers (that's literally why they exist) and I've never had to run anything by my union unless I believe I'm being unfairly treated by my employer.
Yes, from a European point of view this is something straight out of a bad comedy sketch. If unions would be bad for workers, why the hell would anyone want to advertise against them?
Over the last 11 years since I moved into my current role, my salary has risen by approximately £35k. In addition to this my conditions have improved and I work fewer hours. My yearly negotiated increase has always outstripped inflation and I have only lost one day’s pay due to strike action to achieve these rises.
The company I work for continues to post profits in the billions of £s, despite paying their workers fairly.
I’d say my monthly union dues of <£20 have served me pretty well.
Anyone advocating against a union either stands to lose out by unionisation (ie those at the top that would rather keep their bonuses/salaries as high as possible) or have completely bought in to the capitalist nonsense that is often thrown around about unions.
In a capitalist society, people need money to survive. Capitalists want to hoard all the money for themselves while the poor do all the hard work for as little pay as possible. Unions aim to fix that problem.
There is no inherent contradiction between wanting a liveable wage for your work and criticizing capitalism at the same time.
I wasn’t bashing capitalism at all. My comment was directed at the fact that it is often (quite ridiculously) suggested that unionisation and its pursuit to protect workers rights and improve pay and conditions lead to the downfall of businesses. It’s an obvious weapon to try and disuade employees from joining a union by leading them to believe that they might lose their job completely when the union forces them out of business.
It’s pretty obvious that capitalism has its flaws but there is plenty of evidence to suggest that the alternatives usually don’t fair well. I don’t disagree with the ideology but I do believe that I am entitled to my fair share, after all, my bills are rising like everyone else’s. Why should my colleagues and I lose out so that a few at the top can fatten their pockets? They don’t pay me anymore than they need to - they compensate my colleagues and I sufficiently to make us do the job. If they pay less, I’ll look elsewhere and they know this by agreeing to the demands of my union.
Free speech I suppose.
Illegal would be then telling them they cannot unionize, or they'll face repercussions.
In amarica, there is no words to distinguish red (uncorrupted) and yellow (capitol sympathetic) unions. Their using the distrust their lackies created to ruin all unions.
Important point. We do have some words, I was stuck working for a 'sweetheart union' once.
Thats useful to know
Politics. Most conservatives are anti-union and pro-business in the US.
I work in a "right to work" state, which means you aren't compelled to pay union dues, even if you directly benefit from one. This is specifically to undermine the power of unions which are overwhelmingly supportive of Democrats. Wooing union support is critical for them (see: Joe Biden in Michigan recently).
It literally is that simple.
We have free speech in Europe too. Anyway, I originally thought the poster was hanging above a voting booth, but I see now it seems to be some kind of computer for staff to clock in and out of work. Still shitty but not quite as dystopian as I thought.
europe has just sneakier anti-labor laws. Neoliberals are de-regulating everything anyway.
Nordic states are having more far right victories resulting in 'deregulation'. The same in Germany and France. Do I have to remind you the next ruling party of germany will most likely be an extreme right party?
Obligatory, "if a company is trying to convince you you don't need a union, you need a union".
Unions are like condoms, in that regard.
"Oh no, I'll have to go through someone who actually has my interests at heart and not my shitty manager! Damn unions!"
And no, you don't have to go through the union instead of your supervisor/manager. In my union job, they'd send a witness/advocate along with someone if they had an issue where a manager was involved.
The union was corrupt, but despite that it was still the best factory job I've worked in (ok another one was also not bad but that was mostly because no one really gave a fuck about the stupid shit there and everyone just did their jobs without fucking with each other). The pay was high enough that when I was looking for something better, I realized a certification I had started wasn't going to mean more money, just different work for similar money.
Yea. I had a shop steward sit in on all my meetings with management. They represent the union, it's influence, and it's contract. They make sure everyone is playing by the rules and management doesn't take advantage of an employee that doesn't know labor laws, policies and procedures, their work contract, or the union contract.
It wasn't a requirement for meeting with management, but it was something a manager could not refuse if requested by the employee. Any meeting with management would be delayed until a shop steward was available.
I was a strong advocate for every employee to have one with all meetings with management.
Yeah, Amazon is trying to present it as extra red tape everyone will have to deal with, but it's really the union will help you get through the company's red tape. The union's red tape is more about its own power structure, which will have the usual problems that go along with any kind of power, but the union still serves to balance the employer's power.
Exactly. Also, if you ever hear saying "you won't have a say, the union speaks FOR you" (yes I've seen this framing before) you can always respond that you ARE the union! That's the entire point is that everyone in the union IS the union, it's right there in the word.
It's not a guarantee they have your interests and heart, but your odds are a lot better than your supervisor having your interests and heart.
Your supervisor has a duty to put the good of the company ahead of the good of the employee or they're risking their own jobs.
Why don't people understand this simple fact ?
Yeah, I hate it when my supervisor steals my vital organs.
No, but it's at least in their job description to act accordingly.
That's why I advise anyone who has anything important happening to them to first seek advise from an organization that deals with worker rights, a union or a lawyer, as HR are there to protect the company, not to help you.
If they help you, it's only because that's what's beneficial to the company and their personal allegiances in the company.
The amount of effort your company goes into dissuading you from starting a Union, is proportional to how much you need one.
It doesn't matter what their argument is, Amazon workers are probably smart enough to realize any anti-union advertising is because unions are good for workers and bad for Amazon.
I can't believe imagine there's a single Amazon worker who thinks Amazon has their best interest at heart or would spend money to save their employees money.
Believe it. I'm sure a factor in where Amazon locates its facilities is union presence and support, along with cost of living and education level. That is to say, lower income areas with an undereducated population and strong anti-labor politics. Obviously not possible in every region but a lot of the US is like a whole other world when you travel just outside the city.
At my FC, I would say 50% at best would even consider the question. MAGA/Trump support runs deep there. Nobody likes the company, yet they will happily take its side over their coworkers...
Reasons not to join union:
No guarantee that they will help at all mitigating our blatant exploitation of the workforce
Uh, it is un-american.
The un-american argument always makes me laugh. Ah yes, Unions bad, good thing I live in the U.S.A where Unions aren't a thing. no siree, you won't find a single Union here, that's for sure!
Correct! They're un-american in this union of states...
The creepy part is how you're supposed to turn in anyone who discusses unions or unionizing.
They literally tell you "if you hear someone discussing something against the company's best interests, say something!"
How's it not illegal?
Because Amazon can afford lawyers, and people who work for Amazon can't...
It's only illegal if the person you hurt is rich enough to sue you...
Ding ding ding, it is absolutely illegal. If I'm not mistaken the existence of the posters at all is illegal, not just certain parts. But the labor boards won't go after them since they are one of the biggest employers in the country for now. Believe me, that won't last. In the next few years they will have the packing centers 100% automated and eliminate the majority of the 950,000 jobs they "provide".
https://youtu.be/r2VcA7nMJs8?si=858h0BwcIqavhQDp
Exactly what I mean. It's illegal, but to them it's not because they're so rich that, apparently, they're now above the law...
murica
They used to send the actual military to shoot at people attempting to unionize.
Crazy that they are using the same tactics to hinder unionizing that they used a hundred years ago.
Straight lies. How can you tell someone that unions cannot guarantee anything?
They're also spreading this nonsense at my hospital where we're actively organizing right now. It preys on people's ignorance of how legal contracts work.
Your lease doesn't guarantee that your landlord won't violate its terms either. But it does give you the ammunition to take them to court and win compensation, if they do.
The same applies to a union contact. It's legally binding in the same way. Sure the company technically can violate the terms of that agreement. But the union is going to escalate the issue to the NLRB and/or sue them in court, if they do. And you will win, if you provide the evidence that they violated the legally binding contract.
This is what disingenuous corporations call "not guaranteed"
I think what they're trying to say is that being in a union, by itself doesn't guarantee higher wages or better benefits. Which is true, but incredibly misleading since you sure as hell aren't getting those wage/benefit increases without union membership.
"You can't guarantee that your new collective bargaining agreement will be honored by us."
It’s the company who has to sign off on the CBA, too.
A union can ASK for things, but it’s always the company guaranteeing it.
If conditions were left up to corporations children would still be working, we'd be doing 12 hours a day 6 days a week and Charles Dickens a Christmas Carol would be an autobiography on the current bestsellers list.
Corporations are interested in making profits, paying shareholders, managers getting their bonuses, workers are don't make the top 10.
Never forget when Amazon called the guy who organized a strike "inarticulate" even though his speaking talent was literal poetry.
For those of you unaware, that was a dogwhistle. The strike leader was black.
"Have to go through a union instead of a supervisor or manager."
Like anyone wants to go to an Amazon manager.
"Hey Manager Amy Zone, can I have a bit of time off for my leg to heal? It was just partially crushed by a stack of Prime Day boxes."
"Employee 3869310, in the time it took you to get across the warehouse to ask me that dumbass question, you just used up the last of your bathroom breaks for the day. As an act of mercy, here's my empty Amazon Basics Hyrdration Drink bottle. Just try not to piss all over the floor when you use it. Now get your ass back to work!"
That was my first thought. Sounds like a great benefit.
I thought this was against the law?
Amazon denied that they were doing it as a company (of course they did).
Luckily, the union won this election and it was certified in january of this year
100% they did.
Passive posters like this aren't. Actively intimidating potential members is. And interfering with a vote is super illegal.
But posters aren't.
As long as you don't get caught, there's no one to blame. That's what they do.
In the UK, any prejudice towards union activities is illegal.
As a business owner, you could say "I don't like unionism" etc. But you couldn't ask your employees to grass up fellow colleagues for talking about unionism.
I did a seasonal stint at a Target Warehouse recently, and while there wasn't anything blatantly antiunion, the effort is absolutely there. There is alot of talk about open door policies, open communication lines between management and workers, and a culture of "trust". My emphasis, their words. They also have a standing policy that, out of context, is very odd. Knowing what I do about antiunion measures, it's very blatant. They have a fiercely reinforced policy that there is to be no distribution of any papers or solicitation of any kind during work hours or on Target property. They attempt to rationale it with an example of people "asking for kids fundraising orders or public funding websites". Personally I've never known those to be even a mild distraction at any workplace.
I understand not doing it during work hours, but it should absolutely be allowed to happen on the property.
Isn’t this illegal?
Corporations do it, so yes but functionally hell no.
It's only illegal if you don't have enough money to influence the labor board. :P
It's only illegal for them to lie. This fits in the very narrow gray area of what they're allowed to say because technically it's not untrue. No contract in the world guarantees anything will or will not happen. A contract gives you the ammunition to sue the person you entered into the agreement with, if that person (or corporation) violates the agreed upon terms. So a union contract still gives you leverage and power over a corporation, but technically it doesn't guarantee the terms of the contract will happen.
Edit to clarify: I'm not suggesting the anti-union propaganda has any validity. Just that they get away with this because technically it's not lying.
Since non-union workers already don't have any pay guarantee, the only difference would be you have someone who is literally paid to act in your interest that you get to talk to instead of your corporate overlords. And all your fellow workers will stop production to guarantee that Amazon doesn't get any work done until they agree to raise wages.
So basically they're saying, "why would you join a union because even if you manage to negotiate good terms, you can't trust that we will keep our word"?
THIS IS THE ACTUAL TAKEAWAY
Yeah, I thought it was wildly illegal for a company to try and directly influence union action?
these kinds of posters are only illegal in the state of Minnesota, and even in MN that law was just passed this year
It’s not the posters alone, it’s that they’re located with a voting machine
Secret ballot elections are never held at the employer's place of work, they are mailed to employees and then tallied at the NLRB office. That machine is something else entirely
Except in one of Amazon’s cases they absolutely did, complete with Amazon security guard. It’s like they don’t give 2 shits about the law
hmmm, maybe cover up that qr code with this one...? 🤭
gotta be plenty of label printers around the warehouse this would fit on 💪
How is this legal?
I work for a massive massive corp and we watch anti union videos (it's required) I think once a year in our online courses.
Almost everywhere I've ever worked has forced me to sit through anti union videos, but the place I'm currently at had by far the longest, most forceful and blatantly filled with fabrication video by far. It's not at all surprising to say that it's BY FAR the worst job I've ever had in my life. Don't work for Big Lots if you can find ANYTHING else guys, it's not worth the pain.
Went through the same thing with Ross. Absolute shit show of a company and they treat their workers like trash. Of course we had to sit through a blatant anti union video the first day.
Sorry you had to go through that. I'm pretty sure Walmart is just as bad, with Target and any similar store trailing close behind.
I highly doubt it. I've worked many retail jobs including several other stores, none came even in the same ballpark as being as bad as Big Lots.
People shoukd go into a video screening like that and all collectively (get it?) bring eggs and toss them when that anti union video starts
That's the best part! It's not!
But since nobody actually enforces the laws that make this illegal, everybody fucking does it. I can't think of a single job I've ever worked that didn't have anti-union posters except for the one job I've had that was unionized.
Wait how is passive illegal? I thought the intimidation had to be active
It depends on the state. For a majority of states like California and Minnesota? Illegal. Texas? They can force you to go to anti-union meetings and more and it's legal.
Yes
Yes. Most people believe anything if you tell them often enough.
Yes. I hear people shit on unions every now and again, saying the same bs you hear on anti union propaganda.
Other side of what?
Depends on the union. Sometimes they are just there as a mouthpiece for management. Sometimes they fight for worker's rights.
What union doesn't elect their union leadership?
And lots of ways that a union steward can go right?
During and still after the Cold war the US used state intelligence and right wing fanatics to break US labor power. The US is a country with low political intelligence and solidarity because of it.
It depends on the industry and honestly I'd be surprised if some unions in your country are not similar or worse. I'm in Chicago, which is one of the country's biggest union strongholds, and construction unions here are often shitty and corrupt. Unions will bully and fight dirty against competing companies, sometimes even getting in spats between local chapters
Might be a difference in the role the union has fallen into. The unions I'm talking about have been given way too much power through cronyism over the years, and at this point act more like a trade association/cartel acting for the businesses against other businesses, not for the workers against management
Yeah my American brain has trouble comprehending a system where cronyism isn't possible. Here most unions have an associated PAC and are very active with political donations and lobbying
these probably don't change any minds, but unions in general have been so stigmatized they they're probably reinforcing the views of a fair number of people.
Dues deducted from your pay.. yes true… oh no it’s a whopping $20-50 a pay (spitballing a range.. I pay $44.49 per pay)
No guarantees on pay, benefits or work rules even though it’s extremely unlikely you won’t get better pay, benefits or work rules using that line of thinking the company doesn’t guarantee that either lol
Typically must go through union, not supervisor or manager.. okay for what? I got to my supervisors and managers every day for stuff and even if that is the case so fucking what supervisors and managers don’t have my best interest in mind.
Yeah dues are rarely more than the difference in pay unless they’re busting.
I’ve never been in a union so please pardon my ignorance. Are fees really close to $50 per work day?
No, per pay period. Mine's about $42 every 2 weeks.
Ahhh ok. Thank you! That is MUCH more reasonable. Barely noticeable for most people, I’d guess.
Ya it’s not really noticeable especially for all its upsides
Piss on anti-union propoganda
It is always the same tactic again and again and again. Constant variations of, "unions steal your money via dues and you have no guarantee of benefits then, but you do right now".
It's exhausting.
The same tactic, damn near the same words, are used for the same purpose since at least the 1800s. It works well enough that they just slightly modernize the language and that is that.
Bet hanging and handing out union material on company premises is an instant termination.
No, it’s instant investigation into your performance
The one union job I had was was great. Union got us good pay with benefits.
I worked at anti union places and seen many people mistreated by management. They had an HR department that would talk to the manager and a few months later management would say their job was no longer necessary and let them go.
Many states ban vote solicitation and signs within 50-200 ft of polling locations. I'm sure it's only for state+ level votes, but it seems to me like having signs saying to vote NO directly on and adjacent to the voting machine for a legally protected union vote should be not legal...
Yes, union life is for you. JOIN A UNION!
They'd look better on fire.
This is always so funny to me. They have money to get these posters designed, have copy written up for them, get them printed, it looks like they paid for a whole website by the looks of the QR code.
That money could’ve been put in the workers pockets. Seeing these anti-union tactics is even more of a reason to unionize.
The first repost bot to make my All feed.
What is the job of this bot? reposting reddit here?
Seems that way (look at it's profile). Interesting timing given I recently commented in a post where I said that some people do like these bots (even if I don't).
Yeah but bathroom breaks and not being fired simply because you forgot to smile at the manager
Sounds like a union bought off by the corporation. Most unions are very beneficial to workers.
Which grocery store and which union
Seriously, I've never heard of a union whose dues are 25%.
If you belonged to a union that brought you below minimum wage with dues, then something very wrong was going on. (disclaimer, I am not a lawyer, I just care about my rights A LOT) The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) defines the minimum wage and specifically prevents employers from deducting the costs of doing business from employee wages. Things like equipment, uniforms, cash drawer shortages, broken merchandise, etc. The FLAS does permit deductions for things like unemployment insurance, health savings accounts, etc., and does include union dues as exempt and able to be deducted as a general statement. That said, the two are not intrinsically linked. The FLSA generally states that minimum wage is the MINIMUM. I was not able to find an exhaustive list of exemptions, but what I did find was slim to say the least. I'm pretty sure that them reducing your wage below minimum with union dues, which were supposed to be voluntary as well, was illegal. I am more than open to being corrected though and I would love to have a referral to the FLSA section that codifies it.
That sounds less than believable.
I call bullshit. Care to name the company and the union?
Unions protect lazy workers and friends and family.
Literally having several issues with my union and the CEO isn't helping me. What the fuck do I pay them for?
Shut it, pig