Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on infosec.pub

3 replies

lm.paradisus.day

I see what the other is doing by definiting types/values as flakes. Im unsure what the input.x.follows means though. Im not seen follows before.

1

Assume you have two flakes A and B, and A takes nixpkgs as an input. Thus, A defines something like inputs.nixpkgs.url = nixos-unstable;. Now, assume B depends on A, so B defines inputs.a.url = "where-to-find-A".

When you evaluate B, then you pull in A's dependencies as it is defined by A. So B now depends on nixos-unstable. However, maybe you don't want to depend on unstable. You could of course just override the input nixpkgs to a paricular version. Or you say "the nixpkgs dependeny of A is the same as the nixpkgs as defined by B". So you say, in B: inputs.a.nixpkgs.follows = "nixpkgs";.

So now, A's nixpks is the same as B's inputs.nixpkgs when you evaluate B and you didn't need to touch A.

2

You reached the end

Programming using only flake inputs | Spyke