Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on infosec.pub

6 replies

(I’ve had to do that in particular because of how difficult it is to install some specific PHP extensions on their Alpine image sets

Thanks, seems interesting ...

1
feddit.nl

Why not use PHP hardened (distroless) images as a base for the final image?

Why build your own images at all? I'm not sure I understood what advantage that gives you.

Harbor looks interesting but that install procedure is ridiculous. Why would I run an installer script just to pull docker images, just give me a compose file ffs. The only way I'd ever consider it is inside an LXC container or a VM.

Also, it sounds like they've never heard of a reverse proxy and don't know you can do TLS that way? That does not inspire confidence.

5
lemmy.world

Why build your own images at all?

Trust. A LOT of docker images are just some person who decided to do it first. Hopefully php has an official one though.

8

PHP does have a number of official ones, yes, but the way they are designed still makes it often more efficient to just download their Dockerfiles and use as a guide to make your own (I've had to do that in particular because of how difficult it is to install some specific PHP extensions on their Alpine image sets).

1

PHP hardened (distroless) images

That's a good point, maybe I'll change that at some point. The reason, haven't done so yet is that I wanna have the whole supply chain under my control. And know exactly what has been changed since a release.

Why build your own images at all?

Because of different reasons:

  • Flexibility: I can modify a container to my needs.
  • Trust: I don't wanna rely on something that I don't have under control. An image might contain some breaking changes in the next version, and that could cause me problems when I apply them.
  • Learning: By doing everything myself I learn about how to do it.
5

You reached the end

Container Vulnerability Management | Spyke