I found a portable AI coding agent that solves a boring but real problem
💻 I came across OpenClaude-Portable and I like the idea mostly because it reduces repeated setup.
It packages an AI coding agent into a self-contained folder and supports 9 providers, including Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama and LM Studio.
Settings, API keys and sessions stay inside the project directory.
Cloud providers still need internet, but with Ollama or another local provider the coding workflow can stay local once configured.
It supports Windows, Linux and macOS. 💾
To me, the interesting part is not "coding from a flash drive". It is being able to move the whole agent environment between machines.
Has anyone here tried doing this from a USB SSD in a real workflow?
https://github.com/techjarves/OpenClaude-PortableOpen linkView original on lemmy.world
10 replies
Let’s be real. You made this.
This project is ferociously ignorant.
At no point in your rambling, incoherent post were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
“No installation required”. Scrolls down:
Just run this sketchy vibecoded executable and give it permissions. 😳
how about no
"Now you too can make it easier to pay big tech companies to sell your work back to you!". No thanks.
Making slop easier, more convenient and even more commonplace? Nope.
The only problem is people using LLMs and AIs.
These comments are insane. I wonder if any of these people are actual software devs who have genuinely tried using a modern coding agent. Yes, there are issues with datacenters, investment bubble, circular financing, AI being used for discrimination and weaponry, etc. but those are problems of capitalism -- the tech itself is actually useful.
It's useful. It's useful enough that justify the economy, climate, actual living places, etc 's cost?
I don't think so honestly.
and dependency of a subscription to function
I have used an agent to try some test projects (this was about a year ago). I found that while the code did work for the most part, the agent overall produced code that was overly complex for what the initial brief asked of it. And that complexity made the code difficult to extend with even simple features.
I don't use one anymore because I figured that, for my job, maintainability is critical and I don't mind that the code takes me overall longer to write if it is well planned out and extendable.
Edit: I still would not use op's code since 1. It's not something I need, and 2. I don't trust it.
Actually useful in accelerating all this.