Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on aussie.zone
australia·Australiabyzero_gravitas

COVID vaccines will no longer be free for everyone from 1 October

From 1 October, free COVID-19 vaccines will only be available under the NIP for:

  • adults aged 75 years and over (one dose every six months)
  • adults aged 65–74 years (one dose every 12 months)
  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 50–74 years (one dose every 12 months)
  • all adults aged 18 years and over with severe immunocompromise (one dose every 12 months).
COVID vaccines will no longer be free for everyone from 1 Octoberhttps://www1.racgp.org.au/newsgp/professional/covid-19-vaccines-to-move-onto-nipOpen linkView original on aussie.zone
25
Comments9

9 replies

HubertManne
piefed.social

I don't get why any nation requires people to pay for any vaccines. Even people ok with shots do not find it an enjoyable activity. Just limit how often you can get them so you don't get something like the guy who got a whole ton of injections. Honestly might as well add like most blood tests to that.

7
naevaTheRat
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Better get a booster, no way I can afford that regularly :(

Shit sucks, my sense of smell hasn't been the same since I was lied to and exposed.

5
Dimand
aussie.zone

There seems to be no news about how much they will cost. Though some estimates seem to indicate it could be in the $100 to $200 AUD range if they palm on the full price. If so, that's pretty wild.

I was hoping that as a result of this, the flu shot would be added as a free vaccine for all, but seems like the money crunch is unstoppable.

9
zero_gravitasreply
aussie.zone

I'd assume the price will be comparable to a flu vaccine, but I guess we'll see.

5
Dimandreply
aussie.zone

I would like that, but from what I read, the flu shot is about 10 times cheaper to make in the first place. I'm not sure if the government is keen to pay for 80% of a shot. At that point they might as well keep it free for everyone.

3
Zarobireply
aussie.zone

Seems like conflicting messaging going on here already.

Professor Paul Griffin, Director of Infectious Diseases at Mater Health Services, said the transition ‘certainly shouldn’t be a signal to people that it’s any less of a concern or that we’re not wanting to get as many people vaccinated as possible’.

‘We need to handle the commentary really carefully and make sure that people don’t see this as a sign that COVID is less important, or less of a concern, because it’s definitely not the case and not the intention,’ he said.

‘Based on current evidence and the changed epidemiology, the vaccination program will focus on maintaining protection against severe COVID-19 in those most at risk.’

‘We know that so many people are not up to date with their COVID vaccines and hopefully we see this as an opportunity to promote access and get more people vaccinated under the new program, rather than it being something that has the opposite effect.’ 

We know that it’s harder than ever to get people to get vaccinated and any access or logistical challenges can have a significant impact,’ he said. ‘We do really need to make sure we get that right so that people don’t need to go to multiple locations to potentially get access, or think it’s too hard such that they avoid or delay it. ‘That’s something I think we really need to work on, to make sure there’s no additional barriers.’

So they're not subsidising it anymore, it will price most people out, and clearly it's less of a priority if they're reducing subsidy by 100%, but they also want as many people vaccinated as possible, and ensure it is still a priority, but also only focus on the most affected groups, but also not have any barriers to access.

You can't have all those things at the same time, mate. They're mutually exclusive.

9
budget_biochemistreply
slrpnk.net

You can’t have all those things at the same time, mate. They’re mutually exclusive.

It's because scientists/medical staff and the politicians have different goals.

Politicians want to "move on" from anything about COVID-19 because it's an unpopular topic, and get rid of subsidies to lower budgets.

The scientists/medical staff know that the threat isn't over, they are aware it is still a priority, they want as many people vaccinated as possible.

5
mydude
lemmy.world

They were never free, they were mandatory pre-paid by your government.

-17
Taleyareply
aussie.zone

OH NO SOCIAL SERVICES WERE PAID FOR BY MY SOCIETY WHATEVER WILL I DOOOOOOOOO

21

You reached the end

COVID vaccines will no longer be free for everyone from 1 October | Spyke