AI hallucinations are not accidental, inevitable phenomena or errors.
The deadly power of the word “hallucination”!
Google has not developed real intelligence. Therefore, just as an intelligent living being experiences hallucinations due to confusion in its thought system, artificial intelligence does not experience hallucinations.
An LLM is a language simulation model based on a transformer model and an attention module. An AI hallucination is a phenomenon that occurs due to manipulation of weights.
I’ll explain it simply. The sentence "I was so upset that I bought bread" is a sentence composed of the words [upset], [bread], and [buy].
If the weight is [upset], it outputs [empathy], and if the weight is [bread], it outputs [fact-based]. But if it’s a person, then if a weight is given to [buying], then if a weight is given to [buying], then [synchronization] is output. This synchronization is the essence of AI hallucinations.
Google is using this as a tool to conceal criminal facts.
14 replies
The message is diluted by the infographic. The pretty colours add zero information and instead of thinking about the content I'm left contemplating your design decisions.
So you mean you couldn’t understand? Or are you saying I’m just not good at designing? You mean you don’t want to read it? Are you good at constructing sentences?
What does the graphic tell us? What do the colours represent? What do the nesting circles mean? What do the arrows to the words have to do with anything?
I don't have enough information to determine if you're a bad designer, but this one is shit.
Did I hurt your feelings?
So you want to talk about design issues? Well~ Are you a graphic designer? I wanted to know exactly what you were pointing out. And now I see you. You weren’t interested in the content; you just wanted to criticize it. Thank you for telling me your level.
That was pretty thoughtful and accurate feedback you could be using to improve, instead you reject and attack. That’s no way to grow.
Are you okay? You seem to have a lot of trouble understanding right now
I graduated from an art school with a material art and design degree. I'm not a graphic designer, but I am a designer. What I gave you is called a critique. I'm giving you an outside view point because you are too close and can't see for yourself because you think what you made is the coolest thing in the world. You are telling me you don't care what anyone who sees this thinks because it's already perfect in every way (in your mind) I'm telling you that it's hard to read, distracting, and full of extraneous content that obfuscates your message.
Here is a new graphic. Is there any less information provided?
You can't stop your bluff by your lies.
My apologies, I didn't realize you were nuts.
Are you a person with delusional disorder? Oh! My apologies, you never know that yourself.
The weighting is based, ultimately, on the parsing of the sentence derived from training.
For instance, Gemini gave the answer,,"25,000 Ford Rangers were sold in 2025" based on an article which said in response to the question - How many Ford Rangers were sold last year - "25,000 Ford Rangers were sold in 2025 above the level of 2024, making 75,000 in total '.
The website had and cut and paste the answer from a different question - how many more Ford Rangers were sold in 2025 - because when you answer a question the first part of the sentence is usually the answer and the later parts are explanatory.
It is more than likely an AI agent was used to write the website article and this is why hallucinations increase when LLMs feed on their own output.
The point of my argument is that AI hallucinations are intentional. As you said, the fact that it ultimately occurs through learning means that a person intentionally induced learning. Isn't it? Isn’t creating something that isn’t intelligence, personifying it, and calling it [hallucination] despite the name “artificial intelligence,” a narcissistic idea of British Hassabis, isn’t it?