Spyke
lemmy.world

jesus fuck i cannot wait for these old bags to fucking croak and take their outdated logic with them.

148
lemmy.world

Hate to break it to you, but the old bags will be replaced by new younger douchebags.

130

Unless employee owned companies become the norm and CEO driven companies are seen as outdated relic of feudalism.

21
lemmy.world

It's almost like business school teaches a few things random commenters on a website might not fully grasp.

-69
lemmy.world

I think you meant to post this to LinkedIn. That’s where all the corporate fellatio happens.

44

I still wonder how much is performative, so you can get your next job, and how many have actually drank the Koolaid.

2
lennybirdreply
lemmy.world

It's almost like business school is for those who couldn't quite cut it as a doctor or lawyer or scientist or engineer...

As though it predominantly attracts a certain type of person who exhibits psychopathic tendencies in their obsessive pursuit of power.

25

Also anyone with a random office job that wants an easy raise without really learning anything

13
sh.itjust.works

It’s almost like there’s an entire management philosophy our economy pushes that’s categorically suboptimal for and often at odds with making a solid, sustainable, and engineering-first organization.

The only thing “classical” business experts are good at is trying to find the quickest route to monetization. This pretty much never yields a product that actual helps people in a meaningful and consistent fashion in the long term.

Make a thing, and make it well, and it will sell itself. Boeing did this until they acquihired McDonnell Douglass leadership and transitioned their entire business model towards being “investor-first”… and that gave us delights like the 737 MCAS debacle (exacerbated, of course, by deregulation and poor auditing). They used to be one of the true paragons of American engineering. Now they’re just another profit über alles corporation.

Engineering-centric organizations need to focus a whole hell of a lot more on engineering ethics. These days, it’s mostly an afterthought.

14
lemmy.world

That philosophy might hold water if we weren't living in a world where products have to be designed to a price point for consumers. The highest quality engineered lamp will be outsold by orders of magnitude by the okay lamp that costs less than half as much. Not everyone makes airplanes.

-5

That’s not what I’m saying. I’m not universally anti-capitalist. Someone who makes a useful thing is absolutely justified in trying to make it efficiently as possible, both in terms of capital as well as environmental considerations (edit: addendum here), as well as some compensation for their expertise, time, and effort, according to which and/or how many customers use it.

What I object to is the constant drive towards short-term benefit over long-term investment, almost always at the cost of user experience - or these days, more broadly the constant march towards enshitification.

Our current system of unbounded amoral, and largely unregulated capitalism is very obviously harmful and parasitic to our society in a holistic sense. Milton Friedman’s “shareholder value first” philosophy (which has become standard practice for most of the western world’s corporate governance) has been a cancer on our societies since the moment those words left his mouth.

Also, fuck the entire concept of omnipresent advertisements with a rusty pipe.

8

being a cunt 101 sounds like it would be a useful class, but its just reaffirmation for existing cunts

4
kbin.social

The pandemic made it clear to us that our literal lives don't matter. Record profits have pretty much never made their way into worker's pockets. Wages have been stagnant against forty years of inflation and record housing costs, while shareholders and C-suites struggle to decide between a private jet or a second yacht. And climate change is coming for all of us. Given all that, why the fuck should we care about some job that has literally never cared about us? Why wouldn't we get to pursue some work-life balance, and spend what little time and money that are being left to us on something that makes us happy?

141
snooggumsreply
kbin.social

Plus the increased work life balance has been proven by studies to be more productive because people working shorter hours and/or from home are more productive then the regular 40 in the office.

"But I can't recognize it by looking at it so everyone must be lazy" some rich jackass.

49
penguinreply
sh.itjust.works

Also, a lazy worker at home will be lazy in an office too.

If someone likes to procrastinate, you can't really change that via environment alone.

27
snooggumsreply
kbin.social

Unfortunately, leadership positions tend to be mostly interactions with others by forming working relationships and establishing trust so they see skilled workers who are avoiding work by chatting about non-work stuff to be productive team building even when done to excess. So they consider that not being lazy even if it is when done to excess for that particular position.

Can't talk about sports teams and 'team build' in the same way when working at home in their eyes.

6

I think it’s because they can’t pull people into their office and give them illegal or unethical tasks off the record. Slack and email all leave a paper trail.

5

Ugh. The number of vacuous conversations endured/overheard in offices about sports. And the insufferable adages, analogies and idiotic motivational speeches comparing sports and wage slavery. Where's my fucking stapler?

2

Setting aside how fucking stupid it is to think that way, people can still talk about stuff like that. In fact, they can now do it without even having to leave their PC!

No logic here beyond a bunch of loser control freaks missing their completely unnecessary micromanaging.

1
lemmy.world

"I'm perfectly happy in my large, quiet office, sitting in my $2000 executive chair in front of my mahogany desk and using my private executive bathroom. I don't know what these people on the fourth floor are complaining about. We give them cubicles and a ping-pong table (do not use during work hours), don't we?"

115
kbin.social

Cubicles break things up. To maximize synergy we need an open floor plan so everyone can hear and see everyone else.

29

I've never been so angry reading something I had to go through at 3 different jobs.

22

To maximize efficiency we cannot have the cubicle walls potentially blocking the path of the farts and sneezes they must all breathe in. Every fart and sneeze must be fully breathed in by staff to cut down on cleaning costs!

4
penguinreply
sh.itjust.works

Now they're all about open floor plans for collaboration (read: for squeezing more people in the same space).

19

Worked at 3 of them that did that. Worst working environmentsever. Current one is experimenting with it, but I'm WFH all the time so I just made it known I never want that.

6

Sometimes you have to give them a little extra to make them more productive. It's okay, we found a loophole in accounting so it's a write-off.

7
MossBearreply
lemmy.world

Having done cleaning in offices such as these for at least one of the top companies in the world, I fail to see why even this sort of office is all that compelling. Look, a miniature golf statue...

12
lemmy.world

They're not compelling to you and I. They're a way to show fellow executives how powerful you are. A huge office with expensive furniture means you're important.

11

Gotta gather in a room to compare business cards like they do in American Psycho or it just isn't businessing!

4
lemm.ee

He just pissed that business travel is still down. Sorry, it’s never going back to the way it was.

64
lemmy.world

He is mad because the pandemic allowed people to review their priorities and turn towards their personal lives rather than focusing on career lives. People today are less willing to work overtime, less willing to go above and beyond because they don't care about that. It means less money for the fat cats which is why they are bitching so much.

65
lemmy.world

Yeah promotions don’t exist anymore, raises only come when you threaten to quit, and the only reward for loyalty is vacation time to use on getting sick. I’m not gonna show unrequited loyalty.

12

I'm extremely pissed that my company went to "unlimited personal leave" as long as you can get your work done. I'm already salaried, so technically, I could have always done that. Now I've lost the 4 weeks of vacation (earned by decades of seniority) that once enjoyed without guilt or worry.

3
HuddaBuddareply
kbin.social

He's also slightly mad because he now has to compete in a labor market where people can choose between:

A shitty waiting job that has you flying out of town daily, pay is about as much as a gas station clerk, has you dealing with some of the craziest ideologies on the planet because no one respects your authority. High Stress, low reward situation.

Then you have work from home: Right off the bat, you get 2 extra hours back from your daily commute. If you have kids, you are now saving hundreds of dollars monthly on child care. Car care costs go down. Gas costs go down. Less stressful situation, and more mentally stable.

The problem isn't just that he is having to compete with work from home jobs, but he is now having to compete against the benefits of work from home. And there is only one way to do that: $$$.

20
aussie.zone

Agree with everything except;

If you have kids, you are now saving hundreds of dollars monthly on child care.

Myself and most WFHers know still put our kids in care, you simply can't work and look after young kids simultaneously unless you only work at night or during naps.

4

I do apologize, I seemed to have put every parent into the same logical group of thought, and that is wrong on my part.

Though I will reiterate the argument that once you start piling the cost savings from a work from home job, companies would have to pay more at a minimum to match those cost savings.

1

I don't know if "business traveler" is Frontier's main customer, exactly.

4

Frontier doesn't fly business. If Frontier is pissed off, it is because it is causing the legacy carriers to muscle in on the vacation traffic his company flies.

2
lemmy.world

This CEO should be forced to work a minimum wage job for the airline to show him what life is like when you're not a spoiled fat fuck.

55
yokonzoreply
lemmy.world

Nah he would still have so many safety Ney's that he'd never actually feel real fear or hunger

15
sh.itjust.works

Let them have it as long as they are mopping vomit from the floor or deal with agressive passengers. Would they last long?

3
prolereply
sh.itjust.works

As long as there's no looming threat of homelessness or starvation, it's just not the same. If you have a shit job but you know in the back of your mind that you could walk out at any moment and still be just fine for the rest of your life... that safety net makes all the difference in the world in that situation.

4

On the time of writing it I was thinking like that: they can either be locked in a lowest position their regular employees have and save their wealth OR lose it and start over from a blank page. The conflict is that they won't have trouble going to the top once again with their connections and stuff, but they'd not be brave enough to lose everything and would hold onto their dragon's gold nest whatever it takes. Greed holding them back sounds like a fairy-tailish punishment.

But in a real context you are right.

1

We legit need to encourage more billionaires to take up the call of the submariner, they just have to engineer and pilot it themselves

4
lemmy.world

Not biased at all. A transportation CEO wanting people to use transportation to get to work. I can't smell any bias.

49
anamereply
lemmy.one

Pretty sure his employees didn't fly to work before the pandemic either.

-8
anamereply
lemmy.one

Of course, but most of airline office workers don't commute by plane.

-6

Don't think the comment was referring to them. And also doubt that most this guy employees never had the possibility to work from home, so the CEO is talking about other people, eg his possible clients

5

With my job I used to have to fly out and meet business teams every few weeks at their office. Now our business partners have staff working remotely so I no longer have to fly out to their offices as their staff aren’t there. That means we do everything via Zoom and meet more often and engage more directly than previously. It also means that I and my team no longer fly on an airline every few weeks. Everyone wins in this new paradigm except those that focus on business air travel.

4

This dude can't talk about laziness he's got more chins than a Chinese phone book.

47
lemmy.world

Can we just fucking eat the rich already? How many useless cocksuckers do they need to stick a microphone in front of to call us lazy before we just fuck them all up?

It seems like a daily occurrence at this point that some rich cunt who hasn’t actually done any of the work that makes them rich is saying some brain dead shit like this.

44

These lazy fucks who "work" for me got a taste of empowerment, and now they want me to do shit like respect their time.

40

Oh no, a crazy world event made people start caring about themselves rather than being the most efficient resource for you, their benevolent employer. Won’t somebody think of the CEO and shareholders?

38
lemmy.world

What has gotten into all these rich pricks recently? I mean are they all of a sudden without PR folks to keep them from saying just absolutely stupid shit.

Or are they just scared 🤔

36

They have poor management skills in the first place and only really luck into where they are, because of this they have zero adaptability and all they see is a bill for unused office space and with all the easy money recently drying up investors are gonna put the squeeze on c-suite pricks who would rather shoot up prices than eat their golden parachute.

Middle managers are on board because, similarly, they don't know how to manage remote work and can't adapt, which should just mean their salary appropriately adjust downward but lol.

12

Not even just psychology, history says as much do they not know about the Praetorian guard? They killed a lot of emperors because fuck em.

8

Economic calamity is currently happening, and the wealthy are about to lose after everyone else has lost for decades. They're just saying the quiet part out loud, blaming someone else.

6

THE PEASANTS WILL COMMUTE DAILY TO MY OVERPRICED GLASS DILDO DOWNTOWN WHERE THEY WILL HAVE TO PAY FOR PARKING AND THEY WILL LIKE IT AND THANK ME.

  • American CEOs
35

Crazy coming from a man who's unofficial job description is " kissing ass and sucking dick of board members"

26
feddit.uk

Does he have actual evidence that employees have become less productive or is this just things he personally feels out of the case.

We really need to stop reporting every time one of these idiots says something dumb otherwise we're just going to fill the front page with "another idiot CEO made another idiot CEO comment" posts

21
kbin.social

At best the studies show there’s not much difference between WFH and in an office. Some show an increase for one or the other but on average it’s the same.

8

Probably depends on the worker but in my case productivity is way up. I spend half the time I used to spend commuting still on the PC doing work, and I don't even mind since I can eat dinner and relax the second I close my computer. They get an extra eight hours out of me as a result of WFH.

4
lemmy.world

Another company I won't be spending with in the future. Running out of whiteboard space for these pricks haha

21
lemmy.world

I swore off Frontier long before this triple-chinned douche bag started bitching about unproductivity. The reason his company is making less money is not because his employees work from home, it's because Frontier charges fees on fees on fees. Passengers are sick of it. This is the company that charges you $25 to talk to a fucking counter representative at the airport. You have to pay for everything--seat assignment, overhead bag, carry-on, water, snacks. The only thing they don't suck out of your wallet is a fee for a stroller and a car seat, and that's only because law prohibits it. Fuck this guy and his asshole company.

12
lemmy.ml

Agree with your sentiment. This is totally off topic, but is there a lemmy instance that is uncensored? I know it's pedantry, but I really dislike seeing "removed" in place of female dog epithet.

3
atkionreply
sh.itjust.works

I've seen no censors on sh.itjust.works so far. I can read the parent comment just fine.

2
dzire187reply
feddit.de

we need to share those notes somewhere, like a wiki for companies to avoid and why.

5

If you find one please share it with me, or better yet you could start a c/ for it somewhere.

1

This dude is a fat fuck and he’s calling other people lazy. Roflcopter

21

I question the 'less productive' part of his claim here

If I commute (2 hours, one way) the time I can spend in the office is bounded by how early I have to leave in order to catch the last train home. Not only does that mean a 5-day week involves 20 uncompensated hours, it literally limits my time in the office to about 45 hours.

Today, working remotely, I can bill 50 hours in the week and still see my kids. I get more done this way and they know it. If they want me in the office every day, they can pay me my hourly rate to commute

18

Big companies also have big investments outside of employees... such as oil and property investments. They don't want to hurt their other revenue streams.

2

Alternative headline: Motherfucker who made his fat grip killing the planet mad his grift is dying.

17

Chief fatass of the second worst airline in the world said something? And you think I care?

12
lemmy.world

I suspect all large employers are being lent on by the banks and probably local governments, to prevent a real estate collapse.

I can guarantee 100% every CEO on the planet would love to offload the cost of providing office space to the employees themselves . No shadow of a doubt.

Yet as you observe, lots of CEOs are on this message now, that employees should come back to the office.

I’m open to other explanations, but that it is mine.

8

Zoning laws are perfectly fine to keep unused office space from being used as housing, it really is that the CEOs feel entitled to your very existence and want to be able to monitor you 24/7 to make you're really working

1

Reminder that non-democratically (i.e. not 1-person-1-vote) elected CEOs are not only unnecessary, they're lazy and less productive:

In general terms, research shows that productivity in worker's cooperatives is higher than in conventional firms. For example, Fakhfakh et al. (2012) show that in several industries conventional firms would produce more with their current levels of employment and capital if they adopted the employee-owned firms’ way of organising

People are still allowing non-democratic, unelected CEOs to run businesses, all this silliness, right?

8

Hit a paywall because of my ad blocker; archived version available here.

8

That's where the name Biff comes from. Usually as a homage to conception activities.

1