Volkswagen needs deep cuts to remain competitive, CEO says ahead of crunch talks
Blume's comments, made in an internal company memo seen by Reuters, come as Volkswagen is undergoing what is considered to be its largest-ever restructuring, possibly ranging from a fresh 50,000 job cuts to the carve-out of some divisions.
14 replies
To add some context, Volkswagen paid out billions in dividends this year.
Blume could start with firing Blume and other CEOs, for they only take profit but not contribute to it. Fucking leeches.
Too expensive, he be owed the yearly salary of about 50k workers as a one time compensation package for breach of contract if they let him go.
If you find you need to cut 50000 jobs you better start at the top because it's outrageous you'd ever be that oversubscribed to begin with.
I'd expect that they probably will re-hire some people overseas or similar where labor costs are cheaper.
I remember some analysis a while back from Deutsche Bank or someone like that that said that BYD had N% cheaper costs than Tesla, but that it had significantly cheaper costs than European automakers.
I also remember seeing some articles about German officials talking to Nigeria about some sort of trade stuff. Might be LNG, but also maybe manufacturing.
searches
Well, VW has something happening there.
https://www.assemblymag.com/articles/99082-volkswagen-to-launch-e-tractor-manufacturing-in-nigeria
https://infotrustng.com/volkswagen-reopens-assembling/
EDIT: Yeah. According to this, VW also has relatively high labor costs compared to other European automakers:
https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/high-wage-germany-vws-labour-costs-outstrip-competition-2024-11-20/
Just to put this into perspective: The Volkswagen Golf starts at 28.000€. If we take that 15,4% labour cost into account, all workers including production, procurement, accounting, marketing and so on will have earned 4.312€ producing that car.
This is too simplistic. The majority of costs at VW and other carmakers are spent for their suppliers, not for labour. This means carmakers pay a lot more of their suppliers' workforce than they pay for their own people.
He is talking about "deep cuts" at Volkswagen, not about renegotiations with their suppliers about prices
The majority of costs - including for labour - is spent by suppliers. Your calculation and the possible inference that people earn only a small share of tve entire revenue is too simplistic as it paints a misleading picture.
(I made a longer comment in this thread regarding this issue and how international carmakers compare to each other.)
"Volkswagen needs deep cuts to remain competitive while the CEO and executive suite of employees can maintain their extremely exorbitant paychecks unhindered" is a bit more accurate.
That's not even it, it's that they are the ones wholly responsible for the current situation but they aren't the ones being shown the door.
In these times, news like that could be counted as propaganda to prepare the unions to accept lower offers and cuts like that.
Volkswagen is not nearly doing as bad as they are trying to make it seem.
The major cost burden in the car industry isn't attributed to labour but to suppliers.
European brands treat their suppliers much better than their rivals from other continents do, particularly those from China.
Chinese EVs aren't only so cheap because of forced labour, a 996 working culture, weak labour rights, acess to cheap land and loans, and subsidies. There are more reasons, one of them being its practice to squeeze its suppliers.
As one investigation reveals about Chinese supplier payment float,
China's leading carmaker BYD even controls suppliers with D-chain, a 'inhouse' payment system,
its like saying they grown to big, profitable and said they need to scaleback operations.