The costly contradiction hiding in Australian kitchens
As Australians look for ways to cut grocery costs, confusing food date labels could be driving people to throw out food that's still perfectly safe to eat.
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/best-before-use-by-date-expired-food/9ayyie2smOpen linkView original on leminal.space
3 replies
If we want to save money on groceries through spoilage changes then promoting plant based diets is the way to go.
Dried pulses and legumes are protein sources that basically don't spoil, vegetables keep longer, and cooked food keeps heaps longer if there's no animal products in it.
The whole point of this label is to protect consumers; it's not a gimmick or a thumb dial you can tweak to bolster the economy. The distinction is whether the food will be dangerous, or simply lose quality, after the date.
Milk fails this distinction; if you drink it 2 months after opening it may look and smell fine on the surface but have dangerous bacteria and be chunky at the bottom of the carton. Some foods, sure, maybe we could change the label. But surely not the food with many spoilage related metaphors??? Aged like milk, etc.
https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumer/labelling/dates
I always wondered why we don't just have both? Like best before, AND use by? That way people get used to the labels and it's more informative.
And if the tin of whatnot has a best before date of greater than 2 years the manufacturer does not even have to provide a use by date on the tin. What a cop-out.