Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

76 replies

SeeMarkFlyreply
lemmy.ml

America has become a torture chamber for smart people. Ooh the pain!

35

Good thing there are so few of those left there

6

I think it's just the USA, the other 29 countries in America aren't that bad

6

just so people are aware, this is FIFTH TIME the administration has done this: Source

If this sounds at all familiar, it's not your imagination. In March, the Republican administration announced that it had agreed to pay a foreign company almost $1 billion in American taxpayer money to abandon two wind farm projects that would have produced enough electricity to power more than 1.3 million homes and businesses [...]

At the administration's insistence, the company will instead proceed with different energy projects that will cost more and pollute more. [thanks to] President Donald Trump, many American consumers will pay for the privilege of paying more to turn on the lights, all while polluting our own air.

Then in April, it happened again, when the Republican administration announced plans to pay energy companies almost $900 million to abandon plans for two offshore wind farms. Two months later, Team Trump spent $765 million to buy back another group of offshore wind leases.

In late June, a fourth example emerged, when the administration announced plans to pay Duke Energy $129 million to abandon an offshore wind project off the coast of North Carolina.

With a fifth instance this week, the combined price tag for the developments is approaching $4 billion.

25
CosmoNovareply
lemmy.world

Both countries have governments run by very stupid, selfish manbabies and their cronies.

4
Rothereply
piefed.social

Which "both countries"? This is about the US.

-1
Natanaelreply
infosec.pub

They're paying the company to break the contract, not the country

2

Whatever kind of country is a firm is also a person! Seems counterintuitive but the law is the law!

1
mecenreply
lemmy.ca

I wonder if that company earned more from being banned from making wind turbines or would be from selling electricity

1

"After careful consideration, it was determined there is no path forward to permit these projects in the US for the foreseeable future," the company said in a statement.

From the article it looks like this wasn't just a carrot being dangled but also a stick being threatened. My guess is that they foresaw the path to completion would be too fraught under the United States government as it is and they don't see any point in fighting an unwinnable war when they can just get paid anyhow.

The long and short of it is that Germany and Europe as well as the rest of the world at this point sees no point in investing in America's future because we have none.

2
ragasreply
lemmy.ml

That company will just build elsewhere instead.

1

Well yes but they earned money from anti windmill administration and I wondered how long would this farm would need to work to earn it back

1
plythreply
feddit.org

The US could switch off their nuclear powerplants to accelerate the transition to hydrocarbons.

17
plythreply
feddit.org

They already know. Merkel saved their oil industry by making electricity for cars expensive.

3

Yeah but what if Germany were to be hit by a 9.1 earthquake followed by a huge tsunami and have the disaster cause the need for emergency generators that were flooded by the tsunami? We can't have that risk! Shutting down all nuclear reactors was the only option.

1

Normally, I am very pro nuclear. The Trump Regime has proven itself to be utterly shit at wielding every form of power known to mankind, be it soft, wind, or kinetic. 😒

3
lemmy.world

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement posted on X that Americans deserve an energy system built on common sense and not one dependent on "costly subsidies". 

Thank god we’re not paying costly subsidies

77
Fermionreply
feddit.nl

$1.2 Billion to make a project not happen sounds like a pretty costly subsidy.

61
RamRabbitreply
lemmy.world

They are being paid $1.2B to build gas power projects in the US. Whereas before they were being paid to build wind power in the US. They are not being paid to do nothing.

2

Are you sure? Because wording isn't clear, but pay out sounds like a .. pay out, not 'please, build something else'. 🤷

6
RamRabbitreply
lemmy.world

RWE said that it will now reinvest the sum into conventional gas projects, including $900m (£669m) in a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal project in Louisiana.

-1
Jiralreply
lemmy.world

Yes, which is not what you said before. RWE is getting paid for nothing to then invest its own money in other projects. The difference is ownership. The difference matters.

9
RamRabbitreply
lemmy.world

From what I can tell, RWE would have owned the wind projects before as well.

RWE said it has agreed to relinquish its leases off the California and Louisiana coasts as well as in the New York Bight.

They wouldn't need to relinquish leases if the US was the owner and RWE was simply a contractor building stuff for them.

-1

That's 1.2 billion - 900 million, and still a profit making venture. Paid by the US government to still make money. US capitalism.

1

Your interpretation doesn't sound like the only possible one. Do you have a source that is clearly stating these things?

1

No they aren't. They are investing in gas power projects, but the US government is not paying them the money to do that. The money is solely for breach of contract regarding the wind power project.

2

They'd already spent that billion on preparations. If they hadn't received their money back the shit would have hit the fan.

6

Only if you reinvest the sum into conventional gas projects, including $900m (£669m) in a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal project in Louisiana.

2
piefed.ca

This is incredibly stupid. While China and the rest of the world are leading the charge in renewable energy, the U.S. is set to remain in the Stone Age due to pure hubris and short-term profit gains.

Paying 1.2 billion to get rid of that technology is just ideologically short-sighted. It's simply stupid.

22

Exactly, European energy generation during an extreme summer has shown that renewables are the most reliable, until systems are in place for storage. The world can't rely on fossil fuels or even nuclear at the moment due to climate change.

3

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement posted on X that Americans deserve an energy system built on common sense and not one dependent on "costly subsidies".

I actually want to vomit from how stupid as fuck that whole country is to not have done anything to these people.

20
palaver.p3x.de

Why not use the $1.25bn and reinvest it into a wind park in the North Sea? Feels a little backwards to give in to the bully and revert to fracking gas, and then put in another $18bn own money?!

17

Yeah man, that’s the point. It’s backward as fuck. It’s absolutely, mind-numbingly idiotic.

13
Ooopsreply
feddit.org

Why not use the $1.25bn and reinvest it into a wind park in the North Sea

Because the same brain rot makes the same kind of people go insane there, too, and then vote for corrupt "conservatives" that sabotage renewables for fossil fuels (read: for the juicy bribes the fossil industry pays).

Germany is just working on new legislation to prevent renewables where the grid isn't build up to handle it while also providing zero reasons for grid providers to build up the grid. Then they complete the package with no guaranteed feed-in compensation anymore.

Which obvious leads to a "sure you can build renewables, but a third party benefitting from fossil fuels has total control over your ability to sell your product"-situation were exactly noone will ever invest in renewables anymore. (PS: storage was also blocked by insane double taxation for years before a different government fixed that, and so instead the CEO of the record-holder in burying applications for connecting storage to the grid in red-tape -literal years for a process that should take a few days- was awarded with a job as Minister of Economy and Energy...)

They are doing exactly the same bullshit, they are just not as obnoxiously loud and boastful with their insanity as the orange moron is.

5
wepsreply
lemmy.world

I took a boat ride between wind parks in the north sea

pretty huge

the guys you have that are stopping this suck at stopping it because the wind farm are there anyway

1
Ooopsreply
feddit.org

the guys you have that are stopping this suck at stopping it

The advantadge of a more fragmented continent. Just because Germany's government has subscribed to the fossil fuel insanity (not surprisingly given their connections to MAGA, Heritage Foundation etc...) doesn't mean that Denmark or the Netherlands don't build some in the same coastal regions.

Enter the interconnected grid between countries and now the cheap electricity Germany doesn't want to build is sold to them at a surplus. Then they cry about their higher costs, lie that it's caused by renewables and double down on building expensive power generation instead.

See: in the end they pay money so they can pay more money for their electricity. Exactly like the morons in the US do. Conservativism is a cult that brain-washes people into voting against their own interests so the handful of people actually paying our politicians can get even richer.

1

Germany is 3rd in the world for wind in the sea

you're in some kind of hole

1

I mean it's not exactly the same bullshit in the extent of it.

Sad thing is: We used to be on the right track. Not nearly fast enough, but at least we were headed the right direction. As of today, my energy meter shows each sunny summer day, we have like 120% of Germany's energy demand met by renewables. We now need a bit more of it, plus storage, plus the grid to make it work during the morning, evening, night and winter. But then we got an incompetent government, politicians said we now have other things to do and becoming more right-wing is more important than continue to fix the energy situation... Also doesn't help how we now spend a lot of taxpayer money on war machinery instead of useful stuff. It's a shame.

1
fedia.io

I want you to shoot yourself in the foot. How much?

14
M0oP0oreply
mander.xyz

Depends if I am an american or not. Hospital costs factor into this if you live in the home of the fee.

As a non american? I don't know $500K or so? I mean it would suck but not the worst thing to be paid for.

5

That would probably leave me with a lifelong harm. My body is important. I'd only start considering it at $100 million.

1
lemy.nl

This just seems so dumb and stupid on all kinds of levels. What does Trump think he's gaining from this in the end? I just don't see it.

Is he just getting paid by his friends with oil companies? Is that it?

10

Delays in becoming independent of oil at the expense of the taxpayer (not of oil companies).

5

1.2 billion of free money to not do work. Wow the trump administration sure knows how to waist money.

8

If I was president I would order every new wind turbine be planted out side every trump golf course in the United states. 6 per golf course and tackey hotel

7

So it's not just the american "business" people that are corrupt, it's "business" people everywhere, throughout the land. Time to go back to hunting and gathering methinks. /s

4
lemmy.world

What the heck? Why would they care if Germany is generating power?

Im THIS close to throwing my phone into an open fire

4
RamRabbitreply
lemmy.world

The US was paying them to build wind power projects in the US, now the US is paying them to build gas power projects in the US.

10

Ohh that makes a lot more sense, i skimmed across the article

3

No, they paid a German company that was building massive off-shore wind power production in the US to cancel the project and reimbursed them for voiding the lease on those off-shore areas.

Basically the US pays to keep economically viable wind power financed privately away, then pays again for the subsidies to get economically non-viable fossil fuel power generators build instead. All while screaming how they don't want to take part in that renewable scam that only works because of subsidies.

It's so stupid, you would be laughed out of the room if you brought up such an idea in serious fiction...

4
lemmy.world

They are getting paid $1.2B to build other power projects in the US. Not to simply do nothing.

4

That is a false statement. The US government paid them money for breaching the contract for the wind power project. The company is then investing some of that money in other projects in the US (which seems like a stupid decision, considering the unreliability of the country, but that is capitalism for you).

2

But they restarted this morning again since the deal didn't say when to restart lol.

4

Wow, that surely will attract business in the US if they start paying to not do something! Art of the deal indeed.

Well I also can NOT build offshore whatever and I'll not do it for half the price!

3

We should post these in guess the country format

2