Which from its length is more like 2 movies, and that is fine! I think 2 Hobbit movies could have worked, but there is just this bizarre obsession making everything a trilogy these days.
Ngl i stopped going to movies after hobbit 2. And one of the mates from dorm was watching it on laptop on a yarrsite.
I went to cars 3 with my sister later and done.
I feel betrayed. My years ruined. I am traumatised. 2019 was 7 years ago!!!
13 replies
I feel... thin. Sort of... stretched - like... one book adapted into three films.
Confusticate and bebother these film makers!
What? LOTR is missing so much stuff from the books, it's not even funny.
It's a good movie and a good adaption... but saying the content is almost identical is really stretching it.
I think the point is that Hobbit has like 2 movies of crap crammed into it that is never mentioned in the book
And the lord of the rings is e.g. missing the return to the shire. If anything, that horse should be squished or cut short.
Bottom horse head looks way too pretty.
Fan Edit is the way. https://fanedit.org/forums/news-publisher/
I really like the M4 book edit.
Which from its length is more like 2 movies, and that is fine! I think 2 Hobbit movies could have worked, but there is just this bizarre obsession making everything a trilogy these days.
It's avout the same as one extended edition LOTR movie
The film version of the Hobbit should be depicted as a steaming pile of manure under the horse’s rear end.
From time to time I forget that the hobbit were three films. I only saw it because I found a shortened version I don't know where.
Ngl i stopped going to movies after hobbit 2. And one of the mates from dorm was watching it on laptop on a yarrsite. I went to cars 3 with my sister later and done. I feel betrayed. My years ruined. I am traumatised. 2019 was 7 years ago!!!