I don't see why it's necessary for any software. I understand if companies want to release security patches and bugfixes faster. But those releases are usually accompanied by way too many unnecessary changes driven by marketing/product that a lot of people don't give a shit about.
Fast release cycles might make sense for a new project that is in rapid development.
Fast release cycles for established products make no sense. What I want from a project that is tens of years old is primarily stability. They can do their internal releases at whichever pace they want, but don't push on users updates this frequently, it's just wrong.
You mean from your 4-weeks-cycle browser to any other one, which are all (through being based on Chrome) on 2-weeks-cycles? Or they're intentionally lagging behind their upstream, which is the exact same only with less control as you simply choosing not to update your FF if an update is available?
Sometimes I just get tired of all the updates happening all the time from everywhere, and that each update often means changes that makes the program worse.
12 replies
Maybe they should drop the AI and go back to 4.
From 4-week to 2-week:
Definitely going to be vibe coded nonsense at that rate
I don't see why it's necessary for any software. I understand if companies want to release security patches and bugfixes faster. But those releases are usually accompanied by way too many unnecessary changes driven by marketing/product that a lot of people don't give a shit about.
But why... I don't even fully get why there is a dedicated cycle anyways. Just release an update when there is something worthwhile.
They already produce nightly builds. Why are people upset that they feel confident to release stables every two weeks?
Fast release cycles might make sense for a new project that is in rapid development.
Fast release cycles for established products make no sense. What I want from a project that is tens of years old is primarily stability. They can do their internal releases at whichever pace they want, but don't push on users updates this frequently, it's just wrong.
This will be OK with me, as long as I don't have this popping up on a regular basis, forcing me to restart my browser:
FF is always updating already, yet another reason to switch.
You mean from your 4-weeks-cycle browser to any other one, which are all (through being based on Chrome) on 2-weeks-cycles? Or they're intentionally lagging behind their upstream, which is the exact same only with less control as you simply choosing not to update your FF if an update is available?
Good point, It may not be my smartest comment.
Sometimes I just get tired of all the updates happening all the time from everywhere, and that each update often means changes that makes the program worse.