Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.zip

14 replies

lemmy.zip

This is the first good writeup I've seen of the difference between chat control 1.0 and 2.0. unfortunately the article gets cut off by a paywall. Anyone have a full transcript or unpaywalled version?

13
Kittyreply
lemmy.pt

Too good to be true unfortunately, at least for this site. It doesn't work, options num 1-3 direct to the archive site that is out of reach and option 4 shows only text with paywall anyway. They have some kind of browser extension, maybe I will test it later, but be aware of its low rating.

3
sirimeowreply
lemmy.world

Oh damn. It's worked fine for me before but I've only used it a couple of times. Good to know its not always reliable

3
Kittyreply
lemmy.pt

Im happy though that there is underground movement against keeping people from reading news, so I will test this site more with different greedy news providers

2

For sure. There might be other more reliable sites or ways to bypass paywalls too. I've used that site because someone else linked it in a comment here on Lemmy

2

Even if Chat Control 1.0 is less bad than CC 2.0, it is still bad. We all know people who barely know how to install an app from the Play Store. Don't these people deserve privacy too? They will totally be scanned.

Privacy really shouldn't be a privilege only for individuals, who know how to bypass this stuff.

8
kalapalareply
sopuli.xyz

Are you actually commenting the right post here?

11

Interesting... I get a different post on mobile than on desktop where the exact same link somehow leads me here WTF?

2

There's something in the water of feddit.org lol

0

You reached the end

EU parliament lets Meta and Google keep scanning users’ messages, in a win for ‘Chat Control’ backers. What it means – and why it matters | Spyke