Spyke
lemmy.eco.br

I'm not sure I know what you mean by diagnosing, but it's usually a good idea to use the same distro you're having trouble with.

18

True. And use chroot ;) then you can apt update, etc. If the problem is on the distro itself (e.g. not a failing hard drive)

2

Aaah glad they're still kicking! This sends me way back..., a time when burning CDs was the thing

3
sh.itjust.works

Adding on to other suggestions, if you're not aware of Ventoy it's a very handy tool. Using it you can have a USB drive with several live images on it which you can choose at boot time. Great for quick testing, just drop an ISO in a folder!

12
theolodgerreply
feddit.uk

Unfortunately I believe the usb has to be created from Windows…

1

Well arch is one psrticulair i would not keep on a USB. The issue comes when you need to use it after some months. And it is then very outdated

1
reddthat.com

It's not free but I highly recommend Parted Magic. I've been using it since at least 2015.

3

Seconded for that. Parted Magic is so nice that when they went paid, I ponied up immediately, which is saying something from my cheap ass.

3
feddit.de

depends on what you are looking for. grml and kali are linux distros that focus on diagnosing.

2

Kali was built out as a penetration testing distro, though it does contain some diagnostic tools.

Not a bad place to start if you're used to Debian, but it is a rolling release so it may break unexpectedly, or have new bugs introduced with each update.

A persistent USB with just Debian could have all the same tools installed but have a longer support scope on releases so you don't have to update daily (bleeding edge) which is nice to reduce read/writes to the flash drive it's on.

That being said, I keep a Kali live image (persistent) but thats becauae its home - my first introduction to Linux was 5 minutes with Red Hat, but aside from a brief intro in highschool, I really started with Linux in Backtrack, offensive security's predecessor to Kali.

Yes, I have to learn things the hard way lol.

3

I've gotten good mileage out of just an Ubuntu live image. If the network is working you can install packages via apt like normal, but they include a lot of the basics already.

2
reddthat.com

Console ArchLinux every time. Create a USB instance and then load up what you need.

You don't need a GUI.

-1

You don’t need a GUI.

Thanks for your opinion, but you don’t get to decide what I need. I wanted a simple distro that I was familiar with, so that I could teach it to someone with basic computer knowledge. Teaching how to use a terminal was outside the scope.

10
reddthat.com

I only use ArchLinux for rescue. Fedora is my go-to.

What you mean is that you can't cope without a gui. That's different.

-4

You reached the end