Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.dbzer0.com

EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/71975475

Today, the European Parliament allowed the suspicionless mass scanning of private communications (“Chat Control 1.0”) to pass, a measure it had rejected twice in March. Although a majority of voting Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) actually opposed the regulation (314 against, 276 in favor, 17 abstentions), the motion to reject it failed to secure the required absolute majority of 361 votes. As a result, mass scanning is now permitted again until 2028.

EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/eu-parliament-greenlights-chat-control-1-0-breyer-our-children-lose-out/Open linkView original on lemmy.dbzer0.com
258

37 replies

kbin.melroy.org

This is exactly how democracy is not working. EU just pushed it through. Despite multi rejections!

97
lemmy.ml

An entire generation is learning in real time, first hand, that Democracy isn't working.

30

I insist on calling it democratism - an ambition, nice ideal, doesn't work in practice. Same way they talk about other isms.

4
knomiereply
feddit.org

This is our implementation of democracy not working. One might even argue that our system is not actually democratic, because, as this example shows, neither the will nor the interests of the people are represented.

8

System is working how they want it to work. Democracy is a far cry

2
feddit.org

I guess our only hope is for the EU court to deem it unlawful?

47

fat chance, but we can pray. Despite this move being illegal as fuck.

33
lemmy.ml

So you just have to nag and nag and nag until they say "sigh, alright then..."?! WTF?!

39
lemmy.zip

I see 2 different, but related topics being mixed up in the comments a little.

This is an extension of a measure which has been in place since 2021. This is not the new legislation that was proposed earlier this year and late last year.

I do not believe this is a good thing at all! But we should all be clear what the discussion is.

The first iteration of Chat Control, commonly dubbed "Chat Control 1.0", was introduced as a temporary measure in 2021. It was ultimately ended on 26 March 2026, when a vote to reject its extension passed by one vote. The next iteration of Chat Control, commonly dubbed "Chat Control 2.0", is still under discussion.

source

26

Ok, but democracy is still failing here if laws are passed in the EU in such a scummy way.

14

It also looks like the Chat Control 1.0 has a carve out for E2E encrypted communications. So I'm not saying don't worry about it, but seems more like a procedural measure than the more ominous and technology-destroying second version.

Referencing this

9

Welcome to the Fourth Reich of Europe, citizen. You'd better like it here. Orelse.

19
sh.itjust.works

I wish one day there’s news about EU that isn’t just shitty because I’m tired boss.

21
sopuli.xyz

So.. what happens next? They start requiring backdoor in all chat apps (for those that do not already have one)? Is PGP now the only way? That would be extremely difficult since "normal" people just don't seem to care at all.

20
feddit.nl

PGP is not the only way. And applications that use PFS are preferred.

The article mentions that WhatsApp is exempt. See also Signal, Wire, SimpleX, etc

9
trilobitereply
lemmy.ml

And why would these apps be exempt if 90% of all communication goes through them?

4

Don't underestimate the number of communications through email, phone calls, sms, slack, etc.

3

Also: Host your own Matrix or XMPP server for your family and friends. Basically nothing anyone could do to prevent you from doing that.

4

A symbolic exemption was adopted for encrypted communications—though in practice, service providers do not scan these anyway.

Well I guess that's something at least.

14

Although a majority of voting Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) actually opposed the regulation (314 against, 276 in favor, 17 abstentions), the motion to reject it failed to secure the required absolute majority of 361 votes

I'm a bit OOTL. How the hell does that even work?

8

From this article:

The procedure now chosen gives the proponents of Chat Control a significant tactical advantage. Since the law is in its second reading, an absolute majority of 361 votes of all parliament members is required for amendments or a renewed rejection on Thursday. In contrast, a simple majority of the MEPs present is sufficient for the other side. As many parliamentarians have historically already departed by the last day before the summer break, the re-enactment of the regulation is considered almost unavoidable.

Had the MEPs rejected the urgency, the draft would have gone to the responsible Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, where a legally sound compromise could have been worked out after the summer break.

8
kbin.earth

Surely it needs more in favor to pass? Ugh I need to reducate myself on this system

10
illireply
sh.itjust.works

This truly is bonkers.

Although a majority of voting Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) actually opposed the regulation (314 against, 276 in favor, 17 abstentions), the motion to reject it failed to secure the required absolute majority of 361 votes.

More people is against it than in favor, but the number of people against it is not sufficient so it gets passed? How can that ever be possible?

47
Zakreply
lemmy.world

They used a procedural trick which only had to pass by a majority of those present to create a situation where it would need an absolute majority to fail in the next vote.

This happened as many MEPs have already left for their summer break and were therefore absent and unable to vote. It appears that Parliament President Roberta Metsola engineered this, but I haven't looked in to it in detail.

34
lemmy.world

Every MEP who participated in the subversion of democracy in favor of totalitarianism and mass surveillance, is an enemy of the people and should be treated as such.

20

And anyone involved in orchestrating this situation is an enemy of the state, as they have clearly exploited a flaw of the system to undermine the authority of lawmakers.

5

They arranged a vote that required absolute majority just before summer break. devious and calculated.

17

It does. Click the link where it says that backward. The article just has it wrong.

2

You reached the end

EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0 | Spyke