Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on feddit.nl

9 replies

feddit.nl

The paper does state that no astrophysical insights were gained, more insights on how to produce pretty yet accurate images. But still, cool!

39
sh.itjust.works

No, it's really not.

Christopher Nolan's screenplays tend to be hit or miss, and Interstellar is deep in the "miss" category

-2
Toga77reply
lemmy.world

That's like, your opinion man.

Interstellar is a great movie

8
sh.itjust.works

The story is a complete mess that hinges on every scientist involved being extremely incompetent

8

Interstellar is the sort of movie that would have done a lot better in the hands of a director like Spielberg. Nolan's dry, clinical, super grounded approach is unspeakably jarring in a movie whose ultimate thesis is that love is a kind of fundamental force. It wants to be a magic-realist fantasy, but Nolan tries to treat it like a pseudo-documentary.

7

You can see a very distinct before/after Interstellar whenever black holes are depicted in media. Prior to Interstellar, black holes were depicted like whirlpools even though Jean-Pierre Luminet generated an image in the 1970s that shows gravitational lensing.

24

You reached the end

They published Interstellar?!? | Spyke