Spyke

Wait wait wait, you're telling me all the money that was gained not fixing problems was short-sighted? You're telling me there's downsides?

Why haven't people been talking about this for 20 years!!!

6
Laserreply
feddit.org

You're joking, but unfortunately this is the only logic some people respond to.

24

For some yes, but others will only start behaving responsibly when it impacts their bottom line. Until then it will mean nothing to them. They will hear it, and read about it, but they'll ignore it.

5

I do, that's why I work public sector. I work well because it's going to make someone else's life easier

2

people are suffering, but it’s more important that the line is not increasing, peasants!

18
aussie.zone

Didn’t some economist joker get a Nobel prize for saying the climate disaster wouldn’t cause much economic harm?

5

He did. By assuming that damage was proportional to the fraction of the economy that a given sector represents. Which is an ok representation at very small amounts of warming. But when temperatures rise, the fact that the agriculture sector was, say, 3% of the economy, doesn't mean that damage is only 3% when the amount of food goes to zero.

4

You reached the end