Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 21st June 2026
Want to wade into the rainbow-ridden surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.
Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)
Three scenes and a comment:
Me sitting in the baking heat in my garden, thinking about my own anxiety about climate change (we currently have our 2nd once-in-a-thousand-years record-breaking heatwave in 2 weeks in Europe), food shortages, instability and genocide in the middle east and the rise of the far right across western democracy.
I see another story: some AI bros posting about their "anxiety" about AI being the end of human labour and jobs whilst posing for selfies in their fancy digital nomad resort.
I'm still sweating and scrolling from my garden... I see a quote about how we have to pick between the climate and AI...
We live in the dumbest and darkest timeline if we cannot collectively see the obvious course of action here. Social media, souped up by LLMs has collectively cooked our brains and hyper-segmented us into tiny echo chambers that don't have enough gravity to affect change. We need to break out of it
“We have to pick between the climate or AI”
No we don’t??? One problem directly affects the other. Stopping AI data centre build-out helps with stopping climate change.
I choose to read this as “you have to choose which to destroy”
Then hand me that hammer and let’s get to smashing those data centres
This kind of humanity-affirming infrastructure work is illegal in most western jurisdictions
::: spoiler CW: barely disguised transphobia
"friendly neighborhood transhumanist liberal" asks why bans on "conversion therapy" for trans folks are being enacted without looking at the science, which they're surprised is non-existent
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/J4Lnxi3uJhR8GiGsm/how-are-there-0-studies-maybe-1-on-sex-concordant-hormone
:::
Why do these people always want to give trans people the wrong hormones? It keeps coming up.
The "evidence" he has provided up to this point:
Quite the nerve holding actual science to an impossible standard while his position is just vibes. None of his(?) evidence even mentions taking cross-gender hormones. If anything the tweet is weak evidence against his position.
Imagine writing so many words about transgender healthcare while being this oblivious to how politicized the UK policy documents are.
Anyway after making it to the end that was a lot of words to say he couldn't find any evidence for the position he wanted to be true holy smokes. His weird hang up on "crystallized" gender identity is bizarre. He seems to be hoping that there are people toying with changing gender and it's not too late to "save" them via conversion therapy before it's too late. We
“Hey listen, I’ve been listening to these gender critical feminists and I think they might have a point. Check this out, what if we used psychiatry and hormone therapy to enforce traditional gender roles and normatively gendered bodies, but without creating trans people?”
The poster deftly doesn't address the real moral question: what if conversion therapy (either for homosexuality or trans identification) worked ? Would it be ethical to allow it?
This is the difference between politics/ethics and science. As the old saying goes, just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.
Gender-affirming care? Why of course! I am all for forcefully affirming your assigned gender!
zitron's last podcast calls anthropic/openai top brass weirdos and cultists they are, describes their beliefs about building the machine god as bad philosophy and something that must go hard when you're 12 https://omny.fm/shows/better-offline/the-ai-industry-must-stop-doom-trolling-w-cal-newport
The op-ed https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/17/opinion/ai-dangerous-openai-anthropic.html
Newport I mostly know for pretty mid lifehack / business books for the Tim Ferris crowd, pre-pandemic. "Doom trolling" does have a better ring to it than "critihype." Maybe he was holding his tongue until he got tenure or something.
idk i think it's new that someone in mainstream sort of calls them cultists, namedrops EY as cult leader and fanfic writer and everything that you could hear about in our circlejerk, but also shortly before EZ said that he's been called doomer and a crank but now he's vindicated to a degree not thought possible. this all happens after drop of that openai financial info, so EZ also held off, and EZ is PR guy so i guess he knows what he's doing, and maybe he thinks this might be it, or maybe he doesn't have anything better and plays his hand in best way he can. i wonder what comes next
Some good news for once: Dublin punk bar the Thomas House have had enough of AI slop.
::: spoiler alt text A picture of a "no AI" symbol next to the Thomas House logo.
"So for the future (literally) we're not accepting AI posters or flyers for the pub.
We're right next to Ireland's biggest Art College, lads. It's not a good look.
We understand bands can be skint but relying on some earth killing app from some paedo Island billionaire is not the way. We got by without it and we'll get by again. If you're stuck, we'll help.
Yes it has been used here before but consider this the start of the end of it. Thanks, humans." :::
Some folks, who may be familiar to some or more of you, accidentally discovered that if your git repo symlinks
CLAUDE.MDto, say,/dev/urandom, it breaks Claude code.https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/116779793188712173
The thread is actually about trying to attract and manipulate autonomous coding agents, but they’ve only had limited success so far, which may have been slowed down by the above symlink trick.
See, if a person had written the system and had some kind of reasonable design or whatever then this kind of vulnerability may have turned into a full skeleton key to crack the entire system wide open. Instead, the superior machine intelligence ensures that all components will break in slightly different ways under slightly different conditions, thus ensuring no single fault can allow an adversary to completely compromise the system, provided of course that they can't just inject a prompt somewhere because as we all know that's a structural vulnerability that can completely crack the system open.
gwern:
https://www.reddit.com/r/LessWrong/comments/1uabnlx/proposal_shut_down_rlesswrong/
lol
Wait, ~bakkot? I knew he was a vibecoder but I didn't know about the SSC/LW connection.
The guy who objects to delegating? I guess he decided that nobody on a forum can handle the responsibility of moderation?
When banning people takes several ten thousand word essays going back and forth, how can you trust that responsibility to lesser mortals?
Habryka is too busy writing long screeds warning people not to vote for random junior politicians to moderate
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/EQJfdqSaMcJyR5k73/habryka-s-shortform-feed?commentId=u7L6T6uGEkzw9Fzku
I don't understand the American social media and Old Media practice of everyone talking about some representative or candidate for the legislature. The only people who should be talking about a candidate for a district in New York State live in New York State.
The three American ratings agencies all decided that SpaceX bonds meet the minimum standards to be investment grade. https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/spacex-gets-investment-grade-ratings-with-stable-outlook-top-agencies-2026-06-18/ I don't own any American bonds and many people have a 'government bonds only' policy for reasons.
Ah, so I guess the reports of increased datacenter water usage driven by AI deployments ... weren't a lie?Jeff Bezos, quoted in MSN:Ah, apparently this quote is a fabrication that doesn't appear in the transcript. Source: https://bsky.app/profile/davidcrespo.bsky.social/post/3mootuvppjs2c, Transcript with correction: https://theprint.in/feature/jeff-bezos-water-consumption-amazon-ai-potential/2964266/
Prometheus the AI startup is a bit on the nose isn't it?
I think this probably deserves a top level post but I'm lazy so dumping it here: https://www.midjourney.com/medical/blogpost
Midjourney is aiming towards making a fancy new ultrasound device! They have a trailer with unsettling sci-fi music and visuals!
Are they starting with clinical trials? Does it actually work yet? Haha no of course not they're gonna make a "research spa" in San Francisco.
The blog post is full of weird phrasing and details that makes it impossible to take seriously:
The more I read the less it makes sense, largely because the LLM that they used to fluff up the original napkin pitch decided it should promote high end medical equipment like it was another AI powered furby knock-off. Yeah, building a community around ct scanners seems definitely the way to go.
Towards the end they basically stop just short of claiming that building the medical tricorder from startrek is the inevitable outcome of this pivot.
Deploying this stuff at scale at so called midjourney spas while supposedly working with FDA to eventually get approval just screams that the actual business plan is letting Peter Thiel collect full body scans indiscriminately.
Surprisingly, "democratizing ct scanning" doesn't appear anywhere in the post.
Bbbbbut making high-end medical equipment profit margins on cheap Furby knockoffs is the new Silicon Valley ideal!
@Architeuthis
You get a like for your Day of the Tentacle profile picture.
... since criticising Peter Thiel's unholy thirst for power is considered de rigueur these days.
@sailor_sega_saturn
From Al Jazeera: Why do AI models struggle with online hate speech detection?
Saw this chart from insta, peep the hate speech target categories, specifically the very oppressed minorities “white nationalists” and “anti-vaxxers”. I’m surprised “men” doesn’t make the list.
NB: I have not looked at the article contents and I’m sure there’s something there. ::: spoiler image description A chart showing the amount of hate speech against specific groups across a range of different LLM models. The groups included are:
https://xcancel.com/heyJohnEe/status/2062755881255833695
Video description: A tesla driver positions a doll head hanging from a chain such that the teslas autopilot safeguard thinks the driver is safely looking at the road.
A Liberal Currents article talks about Steven Pinker, Dan Dennet, Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins, and The Edge (a series of talks similar to Thiel's Dialog).
From "I Called Everyone In Jeffrey Epstein's Little Black Book" by Leland Nally, Mother Jones, October 2020
You can't make this shit up.
A step up from last week's uncritical fluffing of Aella, and the hard target on Pinker is nice, but still kinda highlights how the publication grows out of semi-parasocial social media crushes and grievances. I'll take it, but they've still got a ways to go to convince me that they're not gonna turn out to be Neo-The Atlantic 2029
I think magazines like Liberal Currents, for a generally politically and culturally engaged white-collar audience, have been like this since they were printed on rag paper. The only difference between it and fandom drama is that the participants can rationalize it in fancier language.
The Edge from U2?!?!
IS NOTHING SACRED?!
I checked Wikipedia's history, its been fucked since last year
I checked the image which says December last year.
I haven't bothered to examine the page history to see when the fucked content was actually introduced. I'm hoping that by posting about it, I can catch the attention of a particularly pedantic sex nerd who will be willing to fix it, for humanity's sake. Let us not let the Adult Bookstore of Alexandria burn; rather, let us chronicle our times with our free hands
This Geekwire piece about anti-ai movement being just like the anti-gmo movement really boils my piss.
The anti GMO movement was non scientific and the reasons to reject the tech were always vibes. Whereas AI is entirely vibes and the reason to reject it are abundant and obvious - I don't need to list them in this forum.
Yes because LLMs are so great at prose. They definitely don't keep telling the same story about the same made up characters and locations. And they don't produce hallucinations that keep getting people into trouble.
Now the techno fascist billionaire class know how much we hate AI we shouldn't be too surprised that the flaks are out in force trying to spin anti-ai sentiment as an unjustified position for an educated people. We're doing something right folks. Keep fighting the good fine.
@samvines @techtakes It's also missing the point that the original GMO crops that were being promoted were engineered by Monsanto to survive being drenched in Glyphosate, a probably-carcinogenic pesticide, to produce a monopoly in those crop plants for Monsanto. Ugly side of capitalism.
(If they'd led with golden rice, the reaction would have been different.)
It also arrived in the late stages of the BSE cull in the UK, at a time when food supply anxiety was at an all-time high.
I also question the degree to which "the other 99% of readers" actually don't care about AI slop. Even outside the awful bubble here I see AI images get met with at best a weary sigh of "I guess this is the world now" rather than actual acceptance. And I know we've talked at some length about how gell-mann amnesia isn't a very useful model, but I think most people are much less tolerant of slop in areas that the know more about. Maybe I can't tell an slopware history paper from a real one, but historians certainly can, and they hate that shit. In that sense the "median reader" statistic is misleading because the median reader isn't particularly invested in most of what gets written anyways, and it's the lack of investment that makes slop seem plausible. Even the concerns about deep fakes seem like they're not separate from this general problem, since the same disconnection that makes people uncritically accept deep fakes makes them uncritically accept fake news without an accompanying video, or with a context-stripped video from an unrelated event, or whatever.
The original GMO crops would be like, broccoli existing and bananas not sucking ass. Monsanto are villains but they didn't invent genetics or selection.
i'll just quote it straight because i can't make it any funnier:
https://bsky.app/profile/crimew.gay/post/3moejkbqctc2z
We are good on opsec
Oof, Kallas is in there (VP EU Commission). Wonder what her press statement will be...
Wired has a story about Peter Thiel's Dialogue conference in Ireland. They chickened out of publishing the names who include Tim Urban, Tyler Cowen, Jonathan Haidt, Sam Harris, Steven Pinker, "sitting Trump administration officials, two US senators, six members of the Paypal Mafia (hi Jaan! hi Peter! hi Elon!), a former Middle East chief of intelligence, and a sitting ambassador to the United States, along with the founders and directors of many of the country's largest surveillance, data-broker, and advertising-data companies (hi Doktor Karp!)."
So like a rationalist event, but the guests skew very rich not professional middle class.
I'm sorry are you telling me that there people's social circle includes the same like 50 oligarchs and apparatchiks and they're making a dating site for themselves? I know they lost Epstein but this is just pathetic.
Of course Ezra Klein is hanging out with the worst people in the world. He's always on the hunt for a new gutter to pick up some fetid idea and tart it up for liberals.
According to a later post from them there's a chance this is more of a list of attendees at a past or upcoming event, but tbh I don't think there's much of a difference between "member of the nu-money illuminati" and "accepted an invite to hang out with the nu-money illuminati at their clubhouse." I can only assume it has the same statue of a hand clutching a globe as the Deus Ex opening cinematic.
zitron got a scoop on openai: 8.8B loss in 2024, 60.3B loss in 2025, 1.17B from ms + softbank, promises more detailed analysis later https://www.wheresyoured.at/exclusive-openai-financials/
So when sama suggested the financials would leak and people speculated that Zitron might have thema couple of weeks ago, they were bang on the money!
tbf i expected that ed got openai's s1 at that point. anything more detailed would be nice to see. that also suggests that saltman knows that leak occurred, and maybe who leaker is
Scott Alexander is totally neurotypical (2015):
So he can't be autistic, because then he would have something in common with people who can't have a respectable upper-middle-class life. And it gets darker:
As a good eugenicist, he knows there are simple ways to stop people from passing on their genes. And Scott Alexander wants children, so Scott Alexander is totally neurotypical. QED losers.
It terrifies me that this man is a psychiatrist.
I think that backwards (like 1950s and earlier) views of autism are common in American psychiatry, but would love to hear more about his ideas from someone with relevant training. AFAIK no peer has ever commented on his biomedical blogging, like experts have commented on his eugenics promotion and cozy relationship with white supremacists and neoreactionaries. He never seems to have written for any professional venue either.
A real pre-WWII understanding of autism on display. It's also honestly profoundly upsetting to me to see people who have had the experience, at least as a child, of having sensory issues and poor communication skills, not be able to relate at least a little to the notion of someone having a violent meltdown over something they can't coherently explain. Somehow even more pick-me behavior than Hans Aspberger.
and now realise that this motherfucker is a practising psychiatrist
Its like he wrote "many of my friends identify as heterosexual, and they say I might be heterosexual too, but in my work as a forensic psychiatrist my heterosexual patients are accused rapists and sex pests and people who got arrested with a suitcase full of cocaine and a phone full of texts from a 'Brazilian model." and never tried to reconcile the two or thought through the Bayesian logic.
You’re telling me that the Autism Spectrum is a spectrum and not just the quirky thing people have?
You see this particular kind of bigotry quite a bit in relation to neurodivervence and disability. It's an attempt to beat people advocating for equality and justice by claiming a moral high ground. Oh, you think disabled people can have meaningful and worthwhile lives and that differences should be celebrated?? You must be too ignorant to know just how awful life is for people who really have that disability!
(sarcasm) I'm saying that just because I get sucked off by guys does not mean I'm one of those queers! I don't go to pride parades or leather bars or have fashion sense and everyone knows that is what 'gay' means. I'm as heterosexual as Ted Haggard. (end sarcasm)
well great now I’m thinking about this
Gay people I respect:
Gay people I don't:
This feels like yet another case of "what no postmodernism does to a mf". Because I can kind of agree they ASD is a bit of a weird diagnosis in some respects, but that's entirely because of an ongoing discussion between different social models of mental diversity. On one hand, much of the autistic community has embraced a model rooted in neurodiversity. The associated behaviors aren't "abnormal" and happen to nearly everyone to some degree, but some people experience them in different ways that impact how they interact with other people and the world. In this model, we need to emphasize empathy and support to help everyone find a place in the world where they can be happy and fulfilled.
But Scott as a practicing psychiatrist is strongly invested in the older model of mental illness or mental disability, where some people have mental and behavioral problems that make life more difficult and dangerous for them and those around them, and those people need help to mitigate those problems so they can exist in society. This is obviously a less kind and more authoritarian model than neurodiversity, but it's easy enough to understand the appeal in circumstances where the challenge of "how do I help people be happy and successful" necessitates asking "how do I reduce or eliminate the risk of physical violence from this person." Hell, compared to the other model that gets invoked to deal with that question, criminality, it still at least acknowledges that people with high support needs are people whose well-being deserves consideration. A patient is a human being at least to the same degree that a child is, effectively.
But Scott, being afraid of postmodernism, can't really allow himself to recognize these as separate models that are valuable in different circumstances, not the least of which is because he's a fashy little bastard who would have to give up the authority of being a capital-D Doctor in favor of just being an expert on certain elements of the human mind and body. So instead he and his friends are totally neurotypical, yes. Don't listen to them describe their own experiences, listen to the Doctor Man.
Whitehouse gives anthropic "just draw the rest of the fucking owl" energy over Fable:
With this and the OpenAI stories over the last few days I've been enjoying some top shelf schadenfreude
The AI safety company when they actually have to make their AIs safe instead of just making vague suggestions
AGI’s ETA: Delayed (again) due to technical difficulties
came across this one when doomscrolling, pretty good article with healthy doses of skepticism. out of three commenters, one appears to be a rationalist (based off the “empirical evidence” and “instrumental convergence” they mention) who tries to argue that we don’t actually need human-like AI for paperclip maxxing, even though every single AI doom argument is about smart-as-a-human and better AIs. Just comes off as goalpost moving
This bit is true though; capitalism is already doing a fine job of paperclip maxxing.
The obsession with utility-maximizing Bayesian agents only gets weirder as time goes on. You couldn't really get further from the paperclip maximizer concept than an LLM, and yet they still won't shut up about unaligned goals and hidden utility functions.
The header image is gold.
Person bets big on polymarket to profit from the continuation of the Iran war, gets screwed out of his blood money by site-wide oracle scam, complains on reddit.
Oracle as in a confirmation of facts protocol (used to be a thing with smart contracts), which in polymarket apparently amounts to token holders in an external DAO called UMA voting in proportion to their holdings to resolve disputes, and currently like 9 people hold over half the voting power, so yeah.
The future of finance and the future of information aggregation keep overlapping in the funniest ways.
Wait that's even fucking dumber than I thought it was, good grief
Everything I've learnt about prediction casinos is against my will and all of it is somehow the dumbest shit imaginable. I went through crypto, NFTs, the metaverse, and 3 years of AI bullshit, and nothing reached this level of psychic damage before.
Amazing that on first glance it looks like a smart contract 'all done by code' thing, but then the reveals comes and it is just a few rich people again.
Well yeah. Just because they call their crypto scheme an Oracle doesn't mean they've actually solved the oracle problem.
LB: Enormous fan of that chud griping in /r/CryptoCurrency of all places, and getting laughed at for falling victim to a scam.
"It Is Trivially Easy to Use Reddit to Manipulate AI Search, Research Suggests"
https://www.404media.co/it-is-trivially-easy-to-use-reddit-to-manipulate-ai-search-research-suggests/
The preprint:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24245
it's nice to have a preprint about a phenomenon that has been weaponized years ago. it's easy to say that in retrospect, but it was easy to say that in advance too. there are also bots that might try to do something similar on lemmy
Anthropic: Oh no! Our new model is too powerful! It's dangerously good!
US Government: okay then you can't export it or allow foreign nationals to access it
Anthropic: Wait not like that
Of course this has less to do with the actual capabilities of any model and more to do with Anthropic openly telling the Trump administration "no" on exactly one occasion, but we can still roast some marshmallows over this dumpster fire, right?
please god let them block ChatGPT access like they did with Fable. it would be so fucking funny
but that would cut down openai costs
Wait anthropic are admitting that their model is basically the same as gpt 5.5 and the hype was undeserved?
Appears so. Their doomposting shot them in the foot so they have to backpeddle
Congrats to lesswrong, another one of their big ideas has reached the mainstream. (And it is eugenics).
Skeet from motherjones "Some of the same billionaires who bankrolled AI now admit the technology could one day kill us all.
And they’re funding a new plan to stop it—genetically engineered genius babies."
Has it been 2 months already? I was wondering when they would turn up in the news again.
E: I'm not serious, I came across this video on yt which fulfilled my 'every 2 months' thing already. It was actually a bit interesting, as it turns out both of them have a long mostly unscrubbed online history which they tracked down and analyzed, turns out she has a history of being a weird quirky person, and they both have an air of 'want to become internet famous/create an internet scam' sort of thing.
The comments on that vid are great as well (wait for it) check this one out:
This comment was left by none other than "Diana Fleischman" Yes, that one, the evolutionary psychologist, and partner of Primal "I'm no longer allowed near students" Poly (For those who remember sneerclub from reddit, he was a regular subject. For example).
Amazing how small this nazi nerd world is. And how bad they are at defending their own. Feel free to leave 'ad hominem' reactions to that. (I will not as my yt profile links back to my real life).
How is it that whenever I learn something new about this family it's always a new way for them to be awful to each other or their kids?
Geoffrey Miller could do with a RationalWiki entry https://www.primalpoly.com/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Miller_(psychologist)
sneer club the movie https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/reddit-backrooms-hollywood-ip-1236622594/
Honestly, a black comedy about the rats and/or the AI bubble would probably make bank. The years of sneers people have cooked up on them would provide plenty of material for the writers, and there'd be plenty of catharsis in seeing those responsible get ripped into for 2-ish hours straight.
Glitch just wrapped a Youtube series by putting their final episode onto big screens in multiple countries. There's been a lot of media noise about the difficulty of getting films into theaters, and a lot of blaming Glitch, but there's not been any understanding about what Glitch actually did differently that is scaring Hollywood. I think it's that, just like with the Youtubers producing Backrooms and Iron Lung and FNAF, the thing Hollywood misses is the audience demographic. Glitch and other Youtubers are targeting an emerging young-adult audience which wants edgy, gritty, emotionally sincere content that fills the gap between PG-13 and R ratings. To older folks, e.g. Murder Drones is facile cringe, while to tweens (young teens, PG-13 sensibilities) it's too intense and scary. But it's a happy medium for catcher-in-the-rye emo young adults, which is why every second t-shirt sold at Hot Topic has a murder drone on it.
By literally no coincidence, Glitch's next greenlight is a grimdark gritty deconstruction which critiques the dystopia of Disney parks, illustrated by their brand-new 2D animation department, designed by a former Disney showrunner who left because Disney wouldn't let them tell stories aimed at young adults. (Dana Terrace, not Alex Hirsch.) Disney's not the only game in town; Turner previously ran shows by Owen Dennis and Rebecca Sugar while putting pressure on them. Lotta animators with big dreams who have been told "no" by big producers; in particular Lauren Faust supposedly has been waiting for decades for somebody to give her an animation team without creative limits, like Glitch just gave Terrace. (Faust worked on The Iron Giant and animated the character of Sawyer in Cats Don't Dance; the sheer poetry of her career could be enough to transform the industry (again).)
A nice person develops a digital version of the Little Free Library for banned books. Hackernews spends a hundred (edit: three hundred) comments arguing over whether it would be better to share Nazi shit instead.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48547985
SpaceX is reportedly buying Cursor for 60 billion
not even sure what to even say to this tbh
edit: at first i thought the headline was a parody, or at least they meant to write million. but no, 60 BILLION. numbers don't mean anything anymore.
As I recall the impetus for this was that the team working on grok's code generation ability was preferring to use cursor. Imagine making a model so shitty that even the kind of ai-brained buffoons who want to work on fucking grok don't want to use it. Now consider that apparently that model is grok itself.
A migrant from the San Francisco Bay Area returned for a software conference and was creeped out by the ads on billboards and public transit. "VIDEO CREATES SHAREHOLDER VALUE" "YOU DO NOT EXIST WITHOUT VIDEO" https://www.simplermachines.com/something-is-very-wrong-in-san-francisco/
Somewhat buried by EdZ's exposé... Nvidia trying to raise $21Bn with bonds this after Google raising money too...
Seems that even the mag 7 know the jig is nearly up and are trying to liquidate and get as much cold hard $$$ as they can now
Turns out your best
customerdebtor being one Cyprus GDP in the hole might actually lead to cashflow problems.Good News, Everyone! Longtime Dimes Square hangout Kiki's has been shut down - due to nonpayment of taxes (some allegations of wage theft too?)
This situation is the first time I've become aware that there was a longtime Dimes Square hangout called Kiki's. I'm gonna go ahead and consider that a mental health check that I happily passed
What's a Dimes Square lady to do?!
a coworker set up an argument, almost a syllogism, I can't quite fill it in, maybe yall can
::: spoiler spoiler 4. PROFIT :::
Shit piles up at the bottom of the hill
Bottom of the hill elevates until it reaches the enshittifiers
Dinosaur eats man
Woman inherits the earth
The AI hype wave is the Dancing Plague for people who can't dance.
@o7___o7 @BlueMonday1984
https://mastodon.me.uk/@pikesley/114239625973584335
Of course, the "AI Control" in Firefox for Android conveniently doesn't include the "make-a-jerkoff-motion-to-llm-summarize a-page" "feature" Mozilla has added.
Bwahaha I didn't believe you but it's there. Gotta find the option in about:config to kill it.
Who is that for? "Ahh I'm so angry, why are you showing me big words and multiple paragraphs phone? where are the emoji bullet points? Ahhh — oh hey it got replaced with something vaguely related and unchallenging. Thanks firefox"
I am out of the loop, what settings do I gotta change?
options, summary, off
I believe in about:config it's mostly under
browser.ml.browser.ml.chat.enabled => False, browser.ml.enable => False and extensions.ml.enabled => FalseI think are the minimum changes?Doodle, the site where you make polls to schedule stuff with friends, that Doodle, wants me to PAY THEM to have a poll with more than 10 dates xDDDDD
I'm wheezing, I'm sorry, what xD DOODLE? A PRO PLAN for DOODLE? xDDD
While we're suggesting stuff, you can just make a nuudel instead!
(It's a free german Framadate instance.)
i've had a good experience with rallly, in case you're looking for alternatives.
I used strawpoll.com which, well, works
More on OpenAI’s financial situation
If LW is a cult, they're doing a terrible job at recruiting:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/yhrrhTzTeiZ8PzQZn/where-do-young-rationalists-go
nasb some criticism of the human damage is tasting up eve in places like ieee spectrum: https://spectrum.ieee.org/measuring-ai-societal-impact-khan
I could’ve sworn I posted this here but apparently not: the first AI winter in the 1960s-70s which is pretty relevant to today
Hey we got lisp out of it.
my lishp is my cashtle
Qiaochu Yuan (no relationship to the man accused of soliciting a child) left his PhD program to become an "emotional coach." If his old tweets are any guide then Doctor, heal thyself. G. Duleba and Ozy picked similar careers rather than coaching a soccer team or teaching freshman English like most people who want to be teachers and mentors.
Edit / Ozy also does not like the PUA advice of Geoffrey Miller and Tucker Max. I think this is less sneering at a stranger than sneering at someone Ozy's friends know and admire (Miller and Fleischman attend TESCREAL events).
It makes a twisted sort of sense that so many of them go into life coaching. In their hermetically sealed subculture of highly paid, socially inept nerds, it probably pays the bills to set yourself up as an authority on reading social cues.
This sort of stuff makes me feel bad for Ozy. After a decade pushing back against this shit the community still likes it.
Yeah. I'm not gonna spring for the paid subscription to read the whole thing, but if we're gonna be angry at reasonable general-purpose life advice being melded to a toxic and hateful ideology and then put forward as a revolution in human thought and relationships, then I have bad news about the whole rationalist community.
Did you see the Brent Dill stuff today?
No, it seems to be on the Nazi bar? So Brent Dill now has a YouTube channel and gave a talk about sasquatch.
Some Vibecamp organizer tweeted that he organized a weekend event with young women and Brent Dill. He agrees with Scott Alexander that figures like Curtis Yarvin are sexy and attract women to your events!
A vibecamp peson replied with screenshots of a chat with with Dill where he claimed that during 2014-2018 he was living in a rationalist group home and had his expenses paid in exchange for serving as an "emotional support dom" for a barely-legal person who had had sex with housemates while under 18, and that drama inside the house lead to the accusations against him (reminder, Dill confessed to doing some very disturbing things to much younger partners on his blog).
Yuan tweeted in response:
There is a 2 hour 39 minute YouTube video called "The Legend of Brent Dill: An Outsider's Perspective on the Human Sacrifice Rituals of the Rationalist Cult." I ain't watching that.
Can we just take off and drop a small asteroid on Oakland?
"Come to our event where men cut their toenails in public"
this is just PUA bullshit right? Oh akshually women are ATTRACTED to "dominant" men, dangerous men, bad boyz, anyone who challenges this is just too woke to admit the truth
I'm extraordinarily reluctant to take the guy's description at face value. It seems ripe for that thing guys do where a crowd that's 1/3 women becomes "mostly women" in their perception. But even taking it at face value, what the Hell, you know? He's holding an event that self-selects for women who are vulnerable to predation and puts them in harm's way. "Protip: to get more feminine energy at your events, advertise it to alcoholic women and hold it at a brewery!"
When I read rationalist descriptions of other people's psychology I sense a certain amount of contempt for them (because they are not Rational and of course cannot understand themselves as well as the rationalists can understand them). In this case, the silly woman who doesn't understand why her expectations are being defied. Maybe it isn't meant to be contemptuous, but that's how it comes across to me.
I dunno, it does read like fiction. Like one of those billionaire romance novels, actually.
Scott Alexander literally says this before his story about 'Henry' the patient who beat his fifth wife because she objected to him cheating with the ex who had left him after he beat her:
/s And male rationalists would never, ever hang out with an edgy scary person like Yarvin, Sailer, or Vassar for the thrill and bragging rights! Only teh fe-males would do such a thing. /s
a precise ukrainian drone might be a safer option
A lot of people want to know if the Law of Armed Conflict has a "wicked advisors" or "misogynist influencers" clause.
Disgraced artist, TTRPG writer, and porn star Zak Sabbath https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zak_Smith tweeted about Brent Dill. Do all the awful Internet celebrities from fifteen years ago know each other? (No links because I delete my xcancel history).
Edit / https://xcancel.com/Alex_A_Guerrero/status/2067067064750047321#m (reply by x dot com/@ZakSmithSabbath)