gmeanwhileongrad·MeanwhileOnGradbygravitas_deficiency "Misinformation" for citing casualty numbers lolView original on sh.itjust.works49Comments6Reply
bss03 infosec.pub3Hide 3 repliesI don't see a citation or any numbers in the removed comment. (I don't see any misinformation in it either, tho.)14Reply
ZZombiFrancis replysh.itjust.works2Hide 2 repliesThe idea that it is a discretionary war of conquest is disputed, so calling it that will be considered misinformation. Same works on the inverse where not calling it a discretionary war of conquest is also considered misinformation.5Reply
ppinto replysh.itjust.worksLmao, PugJesus really banned you for being correct. World's biggest anti communist hates reality. Might as well sign up to join the Nazi party.1Reply
�🦄🦄🦄 feddit.org1Hide 1 replyNotice that [email protected] is solely used to spread disparaging """news""" against the EU.3Reply
6 replies
I don't see a citation or any numbers in the removed comment. (I don't see any misinformation in it either, tho.)
The idea that it is a discretionary war of conquest is disputed, so calling it that will be considered misinformation. Same works on the inverse where not calling it a discretionary war of conquest is also considered misinformation.
Thanks for the explanation!
Lmao, PugJesus really banned you for being correct. World's biggest anti communist hates reality. Might as well sign up to join the Nazi party.
Notice that [email protected] is solely used to spread disparaging """news""" against the EU.
Jackeroni is also a particularly egregious tankie