gmeanwhileongrad·MeanwhileOnGradbygravitas_deficiency "Misinformation" for citing casualty numbers lolView original on sh.itjust.works47Comments5
bbss03 infosec.pub2Hide 2 repliesI don't see a citation or any numbers in the removed comment. (I don't see any misinformation in it either, tho.)12
ZZombiFrancis replysh.itjust.works1Hide 1 replyThe idea that it is a discretionary war of conquest is disputed, so calling it that will be considered misinformation. Same works on the inverse where not calling it a discretionary war of conquest is also considered misinformation.4
�🦄🦄🦄 feddit.org1Hide 1 replyNotice that [email protected] is solely used to spread disparaging """news""" against the EU.2
I don't see a citation or any numbers in the removed comment. (I don't see any misinformation in it either, tho.)
The idea that it is a discretionary war of conquest is disputed, so calling it that will be considered misinformation. Same works on the inverse where not calling it a discretionary war of conquest is also considered misinformation.
Thanks for the explanation!
Notice that [email protected] is solely used to spread disparaging """news""" against the EU.
Jackeroni is also a particularly egregious tankie