There are people who try to allude house objects to sexual organs. Like a lock and key or a male end and female end outlet, and how "it makes no sense to have two male end outlets, therefore gay bad."
This is how homosexuality feels to me. The people love somebody for whom they are similar to. The "traditional" straight couple just does not feel right to me.
Or, the people love somebody who complements them. Like two poles of a magnet.
There are essentially two styles of bonding: either having the similarity to share the experience and background and more readily understand each other, or having one complement another, so that one covers where another cuts short.
Imagine two people liking the sun vs one liking the sun and another liking the rain. In the first couple, they will be happy to share the sunshine, but will both be depressed when the rain comes. In another, one will energize from the sun, keeping another in an upbeat mood, and the other will get all cozy in the rain, bringing cocoa, plaids and love. Both are cool in their own right.
35 replies
In the words of Leela: "You're a man, and I'm a woman. We're just too different."
I want a tricycle.
But all you got was a unicycle.
With a droopy flat tire. :(
🤜🤛
👉👈
NOODLE FIGHT!
A triangular one
That’s right, it goes into the square hole!
When you can finally date AI robots
😫
What, no polycycule?
Best I can do is
Or
If we're going higher, things are gonna start to get weird.
This is acceptable.
I have no need to fuck a front wheel. I'm just gonna ace it up and ride a wheelie.
What about a unicycle??
There's just something special about being a wheelie master.
well this seems as good an opportunity as any to promote one of my very favorite films, at least tangentially related. https://youtu.be/KkuheYVbU3Q
So would gay or lesbian be only square wheels?
gay marriage is great until you consider the cost of the catenary track.
Oh so if I buy square wheels for my car I can finally ride the roads in my town.
Yes, men are only meant to ride boobs
I know we are in shitposting but I can't seem to nail down what fallacy this appeals to. Is this a reduction ab adsurdium or just a strawman?
There are people who try to allude house objects to sexual organs. Like a lock and key or a male end and female end outlet, and how "it makes no sense to have two male end outlets, therefore gay bad."
Oh, gotcha, my lock may not fit many keys but I won't disparage anyone from trying
Two male ends is called a suicide cord. Two female ends is an extension...
Relevant, maybe…?
This is how homosexuality feels to me. The people love somebody for whom they are similar to. The "traditional" straight couple just does not feel right to me.
Nope, men in one corridor and women in another.
Edit: and there's nothing hypocritical about this, at all.
Or, the people love somebody who complements them. Like two poles of a magnet.
There are essentially two styles of bonding: either having the similarity to share the experience and background and more readily understand each other, or having one complement another, so that one covers where another cuts short.
Imagine two people liking the sun vs one liking the sun and another liking the rain. In the first couple, they will be happy to share the sunshine, but will both be depressed when the rain comes. In another, one will energize from the sun, keeping another in an upbeat mood, and the other will get all cozy in the rain, bringing cocoa, plaids and love. Both are cool in their own right.
This is why I just can’t support straight people. Their choice of lifestyle just isn’t natural.
Heterocycle is more like one tire is a square, and the other is a triangle.
Lesbian marriage (they're both squares)
this post is wrong in two ways and im glad you pointed out the first one
lesbian marriage is great until you consider the cost of the catenary track.