Spyke
qazreply
lemmy.world

I don't. It shows that projects are getting flooded by low quality AI submissions to the point where they feel they need to ban it, despite the difficulty of enforcing it.

I worry that at some point many online spaces will deteriorate because real interactions and content are drowned out by AI.

15
_stranger_reply
lemmy.world

They are, it's spam, and just like spam email, it probably won't ever stop, so we need to build spam filters now

6

I'm not looking forward to finding out my PR has ended up in the spam folder 😔

3
lemmy.world

We banned the rain. You cannot ban AI, it is everywhere and too useful, AI was probably used at some level to define the details of the ban. But what you can do is use it appropriately and keep in your mind at all times the point of the exercise is the wellbeing and development of people.

-24

AI was probably used at some level to define the details of the ban

I cannot imagine a better demonstration of brain rot than thinking everyone else is as brain rot as oneself.

19

I really doubt he would have used AI for writing the policy against it after listening to him, but regardless. I do agree with you that it won't go away, and we'll have to find appropriate solutions to deal with it.

5

what you can do is use it appropriately and keep in your mind at all times the point of the exercise is the wellbeing and development of people.

Yes, let's pretend everything is fine and corporations' interests are our own.

5

yeah because before ai doing something like defining the details of a ban were impossible or so ardous as to virtually be impossible.

3

My left nut is more useful and it's gone on account of giving me cancer.

3

You reached the end

Zig 2026: No-AI Policy, $670K Foundation, Left GitHub & Why Zig Isn’t 1.0 - Andrew Kelley Explains | Jetbrains | Spyke