Why is it on a Poster to prove a post is Ai and not the accuser?
NSFW
I made this post and someone claimed it was AI.
A quick image reverse search revealed her name is Adiza Sankofa. Yet the post got flagged for not identifying as AI.
I could claim half the posts on this site could be AI. And I find there's a certain typo of member who see's AI everywhere regardless of whether it is or not. On alot of posts I have made it's been claimed that they are AI. Even when clearly they are not.
All I'm suggesting is it should be on the accuser to prove it's AI, not the poster. Because it can be hard as hell to prove a negative.
because it's pretty easy to prove if you've got the source. (Adiza's IG page, for example.) this isn't a court of law... and the people commenting on that post said why they think that. it's pretty convincing.
She's real and has an onlyfans but doesn't appear to do full nude content, so it looks like its an AI generated video of her going topless.
Hey, Bob. Though event. One way to aproach this situation, in my view, is looking back and remembering when posting without source was badly viewed.
AI is a poison. All type of people is using and abusing it for the wrong ends and results.
With more and more people using it to "create" content, it's fair to request proof of source and authenticity. The machines need real human input to copycat from. Requiring proof of origin is fair; respects the true creator.
Raise the level, Bob.