"The West" means nothing to me. Youre talking about culture. I do not give a fuck about a culture. I do give a fuck about the economic system the culture chooses to engage in, and the way that culture regulates themselves (or rather if they get a say in that regulation at all). I do not support any form of capitalism, nor fascism. I especially do no support a system in which the people of the system are not respected or represented. Russia choosing to start a war over nonsense and throwing their entire young male population into the meat grinder shows me they are not a system worth supporting.
Really not sure what you were expecting from a community about Late Stage Capitalism (Something typically associated with the rise of fascism and declining lifestyle for citizens), but if you were expecting a crowd of pro-war people, you were incorrect.
I was a regular of the community on Reddit. They are very anti imperialism which you don't look like. Also judging from your discourse you sound like a liberal.
Russia has an obsession with the northern plains due to the possibility of an invasion and people need to realize that america will do much worse if this will be happening in Mexico for example
Whew, I am ecstatic that this is not the community you were expecting. I'd hate to see a community based around decrying capitalism get turned into something the has nothing to do with capitalism by someone who appears to misunderstand the very concept behind the original subreddit. Thankfully, idiocy always advertises itself thus. Thank you for your service in outing yourself. Always wonderful to have another username for the tag list.
You are pathetic and use this kind of language instead of arguments because you have none and know that you have a propaganda apparatus behind you that will reward you through upvotes
2: Even if it was, so what? That doesn't change the fact that Russia decided to invade and start a multiple year long war that they are clearly struggling with.
I think you misunderstand what source should be. Let me speak in your language.
Источник, бро, это любой новосной портал где привидены факты. Просто видос запостить это не факты и доказательства. Методичка у тебя устарела, спроси у начальника есть ли новая.
I am fluent in russian and can absorb both sources at the same time. And, if you ask me, that tiny 4 people dead form a mass drone attack is negligible compared to what ruzzia does to Ukraine on weekly basis + what they have done to the land they already conquered.
Russians been living the war-free life for much longer than Ukranians. Time to taste reality. Tuapse already can tell a whole lot of things to the rest of population.
Sad to hear that 4 civilians died. Happy to hear that russian citizens finally know what war with a neighbor means.
Is there more to this story? I see a tiktok video with burning buildings. How do we know who fired what, when is this, where is this? Is this the only source?
Strictly civilians? Probably around 10x more Ukrainians. At least 15,000+ with several times that injured. Russians, probably in the thousands at most.
UA is attacking civilians and calling it justified. So it does the entire western hemisphere and their followers while they scream from the rooftops when the opposite side does the same.
No in this particular conflict. The one where you so astutely asserted the value of civilian lives. I agree with you that is a pretty valid standard on the morality of the warring nations.
I need this to ascertain how many civilian lives you are willing to allow per side. This is to check for what you call 'hippcrisy' where you weigh certain lives heavier than others.
I agree that this measure should be accounted for in every conflict, but in ths case I suspect some bias from one that self proclaims to be a tankie.
How many innocent citizens did the UA kill and how many did Russia kill ?
I'm sorry what is the relevance to this community exactly?
Isn't this the same LSC from Reddit?
No clue. I havent used Reddit in ages. Even if it is, how does Russia's fascist land war relate to late stage capitalism?
I consider it a war against western expansion towards Russia's borders.
Do you think Russia are the good guys?
Do you think the west are the good guys? Because if you do then this is not the community I was expecting
"The West" means nothing to me. Youre talking about culture. I do not give a fuck about a culture. I do give a fuck about the economic system the culture chooses to engage in, and the way that culture regulates themselves (or rather if they get a say in that regulation at all). I do not support any form of capitalism, nor fascism. I especially do no support a system in which the people of the system are not respected or represented. Russia choosing to start a war over nonsense and throwing their entire young male population into the meat grinder shows me they are not a system worth supporting.
Really not sure what you were expecting from a community about Late Stage Capitalism (Something typically associated with the rise of fascism and declining lifestyle for citizens), but if you were expecting a crowd of pro-war people, you were incorrect.
I was a regular of the community on Reddit. They are very anti imperialism which you don't look like. Also judging from your discourse you sound like a liberal.
Russia has an obsession with the northern plains due to the possibility of an invasion and people need to realize that america will do much worse if this will be happening in Mexico for example
Whew, I am ecstatic that this is not the community you were expecting. I'd hate to see a community based around decrying capitalism get turned into something the has nothing to do with capitalism by someone who appears to misunderstand the very concept behind the original subreddit. Thankfully, idiocy always advertises itself thus. Thank you for your service in outing yourself. Always wonderful to have another username for the tag list.
The original sub is communist. This one seems to not be
The west are not the good guys
But it's Russia that invaded and is trying to expand their borders
Russia want only to protect itself against the possibility of an invasion from nato
Notice how NATO isn't helping Trump in Iran? That's because NATO doesn't attack anyone, it's a defensive treaty.
Nato has attacked a lot of country in the past. And even though they are not technically bombing Iran nato countries do provide logistics support
Hahaha do you actually believe that? You are dumber than I thought.
Dumb is not knowing several US presidents have acknowledged this, including Biden, as well as numerous top military officials
How bombing Libya was defending Europe?
I'd recommend ua stop wasting trillions of eu money and do some actual fighting
You are pathetic and use this kind of language instead of arguments because you have none and know that you have a propaganda apparatus behind you that will reward you through upvotes
You appear to have responded to @[email protected], when you mean to have been talking to a mirror.
Russia can't even beat a country that is wasting money and not fighting?
Do you realize that Russia is fighting mostly alone against the entirety of Nato.
1: NATO hasn't even turned up
2: Even if it was, so what? That doesn't change the fact that Russia decided to invade and start a multiple year long war that they are clearly struggling with.
1 - the billions Ukraine get allowed them to develop their own military tech and be able to defense itself against Ukraine
2 - I agree that Russia is the aggressor
Russia is playing the long game. They have the choice to attack now or be attacked later.
All NATO countries assisted UA with money military equipment training intelligence and even human resources
If NATO wanted to attack Russia, invading Ukraine gives them the best reason to do it.
Of course nato imperialists want to attack Russia and also china
Source would be nice. All I see is one building on fire.
Edit: also wrong comm
Source is the video. Western media does not always cover the subject as it might make their favorite not look favorable
I think you misunderstand what source should be. Let me speak in your language.
Источник, бро, это любой новосной портал где привидены факты. Просто видос запостить это не факты и доказательства. Методичка у тебя устарела, спроси у начальника есть ли новая.
Jokes on you I don't understand Cyrillic but you have defaulted to your propaganda and now the apparatus will come to downvote me
I am fluent in russian and can absorb both sources at the same time. And, if you ask me, that tiny 4 people dead form a mass drone attack is negligible compared to what ruzzia does to Ukraine on weekly basis + what they have done to the land they already conquered.
Russians been living the war-free life for much longer than Ukranians. Time to taste reality. Tuapse already can tell a whole lot of things to the rest of population.
Sad to hear that 4 civilians died. Happy to hear that russian citizens finally know what war with a neighbor means.
Classical libtard shit who praises the killing of civilians when is done by their side
Upon reviewing your activity, I clearly can state that you are a sleeper bot that got activated for some reason. Cheers, mate. Have a fun one.
Uuuuu. Everyone that does not align with how I think is a bot
Is there more to this story? I see a tiktok video with burning buildings. How do we know who fired what, when is this, where is this? Is this the only source?
Could you summarize for me the amount of civilians killed per side in this war?
Strictly civilians? Probably around 10x more Ukrainians. At least 15,000+ with several times that injured. Russians, probably in the thousands at most.
Thanks <3 I really needed OP to answer this, but he fails to come up with the numbers somehow. Curious.
UA is attacking civilians and calling it justified. So it does the entire western hemisphere and their followers while they scream from the rooftops when the opposite side does the same.
It looks like hippcrisy
The numbers please?
Millions in Irak, Lybia Afghanistan, Gaza
No in this particular conflict. The one where you so astutely asserted the value of civilian lives. I agree with you that is a pretty valid standard on the morality of the warring nations.
I need this to ascertain how many civilian lives you are willing to allow per side. This is to check for what you call 'hippcrisy' where you weigh certain lives heavier than others.
I agree that this measure should be accounted for in every conflict, but in ths case I suspect some bias from one that self proclaims to be a tankie.
How many innocent citizens did the UA kill and how many did Russia kill ?
(I'll allow you to leave deportation out of this)
There is a difference between collaterals and deliberately targeting civilians which the west does
What does this have to do with Capitalism???