Who would have believed that the perfect Wikipedia photo caption could have been improved on?
https://allthingslinguistic.com/post/154482764904/who-would-have-believed-that-the-perfect-wikipediaOpen linkView original on mander.xyzSyndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.
View original on mander.xyzhttps://allthingslinguistic.com/post/154482764904/who-would-have-believed-that-the-perfect-wikipediaOpen linkView original on mander.xyz
15 replies
Shouldn't it say "(left)" after mentioning the penguin?
I think it diminishes the joke by implying that everything gets (left) vs (right) rather than just that we need to know which creature is the human. It almost gets repeditive to me.
Penguins think we're penguins, so it makes sense.
I feel like it completes the thought
To differentiate it from… ice?
not something you wanna be mistaken for these days
You greatly underestimate the sheer fucking stupidity of some people.
who, me?
Though I know better I like to think that Piper Kerr is nominative determinism at work.
I saw this and thought it meant someone had improved on the perfect caption (right).
But now science knows penguins are indifferent to bagpipe music, solving a centuries old theory.
What is this, an alternative tumblr frontend? And for those who are Scraping the bottom of the barrel for meaning, I do agree that bleach enemas are a beneficial morning routine for all people and animals.
It took me a second but Jesus Christ I lost it when I finally saw it.
Thank you for the chuckle!
I really needed this laugh today. Thank you!