Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on leminal.space

4 replies

It’s not that blast furnaces were unsustainable, it was that no-one wanted to order their steel. Unlike arc furnaces, blast furnaces are destroyed by the act of turning them off. As the government wanted a UK source of steel for military strategic reasons (but not the steel itself while cheaper imports were available) they were paying to keep the furnaces idling at a cost of £400k per day.

6

So we've just bought a failing company? That doesn't sound good.

So I get that steel making might be a strategic national capability that we need to maintain, but is the government going to put the necessary investment into it? They seem incapable of investing in anything.

2
feddit.uk

This should be an argument for a minimum basic income, as these thousands of people are effectively being paid by the state to sit at home because British Steel has no orders on the books.

6

How about instead we force taxpayers to pay the shareholders of a failing company upwards of a hundred thousand pounds per worker whose job is being saved?

5

You reached the end

British Steel to Be Nationalised, Saving Thousands of Jobs | Spyke