Spyke
jdr
lemmy.ml

Are they still trying to make snap happen?

It's not going to happen.

22
Wilmoreply
lemmy.ml

Its also for my experience the worst way to use apps.

The fact that I can't "update" my software without closing it first.

Why can I do that with all other package formats? I get it won't be the new version until I reopen the app but still. Its unnecessary friction.

Also with the prompting last I used it Firefox couldn't download anything with it enabled.

Like you ship Ubuntu with like 4 major snaps including the security center and it hasn't or hadn't worked with your shipped snaps for at least a year?

10
atzanteolreply
sh.itjust.works

The fact that I can't "update" my software without closing it first.

Why can I do that with all other package formats? I get it won't be the new version until I reopen the app

Asked and answered.

-2
Wilmoreply
lemmy.ml

Not really though? Or rather - then answer the other half. Why are flatpaks, deb, rpm, arch, etc. ALL able to update in place? But with snaps we need that sucker closed? It sucks to use like that.

3
atzanteolreply
sh.itjust.works

Because the app isn't updated until it's restarted.

Do you think you applied that Firefox security update because you updated the flatpak? Because you haven't if you left your browser running.

-1
Wilmoreply
lemmy.ml

Did I explicitly state that I was aware of how this worked in my original comment? I did? Oh good.

I don't care if Firefox isn't updated until I restart it. I just don't want that terrible workflow:

Click update all. Firefox is open, therefore won't update until you close it and click update again.

Every other package manager: Click update. All apps update. When I am ready to close Firefox it'll be updated next time I use it.

4
atzanteolreply
sh.itjust.works

Did I explicitly state that I was aware of how this worked in my original comment? I did? Oh good.

Hence my "asked and answered" response. 🙄

-1

the question asked was "why can't snap do this thing, that every other package manager can"

stop being obtuse on purpose.

3

The problem is that you have to break your workflow to update shit, or you have to do updates multiple times to work around the things you're doing.

2

Snap is already a big part of Ubuntu since years. So what do you mean by "its not going to happen"?

6

It's a good improvement. They needed this years ago (or ideally, when they first started using snaps).

4

They have been trying to work with the Flatpak people to make it a standard everyone could share. After half a decade of frustration I think they just gave up and decided to do it themselves.

1

You reached the end