Spyke
Skyline969reply
piefed.ca

Ubuntu is one of the most used distros in both desktop and server environments. Take down the update servers, can’t patch CopyFail. Can’t patch CopyFail, more time to access affected systems.

That’s my paranoid take anyway.

23
kamstrupreply
programming.dev

Normally patches roll out before the vulnerability is disclosed. But I honestly don't know the status on CopyFail

11
Jesus_666reply
lemmy.world

Most distros delivered patched kernels well before the vulnerability was publicly disclosed. Not sure if Ubuntu did but they had ample time to do so.

7
Jesus_666reply
lemmy.world

Interesting. So only the fast distros were done patching by time of disclosure. The ones you wouldn't run a server on. Because only the kernel devs better informed. That's... pretty amateurish from the guys who discovered CopyFail.

3

Even then, some of the upstream LTS kernels didn't get the patch until the 30th.

5

@Jesus_666 @kamstrup its my understanding that this actually hasn’t been patched in most distributions. The ubuntu statement says they released mitigations and disabled the kernel module affected but that patches will be released. according to a post on linkedin made yesterday and a video attached to it demonstrating the exploit on a current kali release it hasnt been fixed

3

Yeah, I turned out to be slightly misinformed. The kernel sources had a fix for a while now and fast moving distros like Arch immediately picked them up. But nobody except the kernel devs was told about the vuln and so nobody expedited deployment of a fixed kernel. Ouch.

2
Miaoureply

The Debian Bookworm fix was only rolled out last night. Bookworm was not directly affected though, so maybe that's why it took a bit more time

2
poinckreply
lemmy.world

I could update Ubuntu servers despite the DDoS.

3
feddit.org

Does Ubuntu, like Debian, make you choose a repository mirror during the installation?

1

You reached the end

Canonical Says Ubuntu Infrastructure Is Facing Cross-Border DDoS Attack | Spyke