Can you call it winning an argument when it's just two sentences?
Dragonite is being stupid, but whatever current says isn't invalidating anything Dragonite says. No proof that the game is AI slop, and even if it is, no point is made to link it as invalidating the game.
I'd prefer if the title was "Further SLAMS Dragonite about their stupid opinion on Pokemon Winds & Waves!!!!!1!". At least the hyperbole is obvious.
I don't think you can actually tell what is and isn't AI generated if you really think the new Pokemon game looks "obviously AI" from what's been shown.
Can you call it winning an argument when it's just two sentences?
Dragonite is being stupid, but whatever current says isn't invalidating anything Dragonite says. No proof that the game is AI slop, and even if it is, no point is made to link it as invalidating the game.
I'd prefer if the title was "Further SLAMS Dragonite about their stupid opinion on Pokemon Winds & Waves!!!!!1!". At least the hyperbole is obvious.
The "game" literally is AI-slop, though. You can tell just by looking at it. And if it's AI-slop, it isn't a game.
Haven't seen any evidence Nintendo had used AI though?
Look at anything in the "game" at all. You can obviously tell that it's AI-slop just by looking at it.
... Are you just trolling or?...
I'm not, actually. You're confusing me with yourself.
I don't think you can actually tell what is and isn't AI generated if you really think the new Pokemon game looks "obviously AI" from what's been shown.
Well, of course it's obviously AI. If it wasn't, I wouldn't have corrected you.
Don't take the bait guys and gals, this is just a troll post. Report and move on.
You commented on the wrong post.