Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.fmhy.ml

6 replies

lemmy.dbzer0.com

So let me get this straight: the police arrested them on suspicion of conspiracy to commit (generic, unspecified) "terrorism," but can't accuse them of plotting any specific terrorist act, and they excuse this by saying that the details of the alleged plots must all be in the encrypted communications that they can't read?

So the French police can just make up crimes that haven't happened, and then claim that the total lack of evidence is because the defendant has hidden the evidence (which "must" exist) so well? Damn.

16
Kleysleyreply
lemmy.fmhy.ml

Pretty much. Although, these people did some illegal things related to explosives...

4

Did they? I scanned their Wikipedia article and it seemed like they were primarily under suspicion because they had previously left the country to fight with the YPG.

2

Yeah. And it is already illegal to not provide access to your phone to the police. It seem that they try to expand it.

3
lemmy.ml

I find the inclusion of WhatsApp hilarious.

7

You reached the end

Criminalization of encryption : the 8 december case | Spyke