lemmyshitpost·Lemmy Shitpostbynot_IO journalist? what is your purpose?https://social.coop/@fraggle/116242774957677026View original on lemmy.blahaj.zone415Comments11
First_Thunder lemmy.zip1Hide 1 replyI mean, Banksy is actually a challenge, the Epstein files are just evident91
Microw replypiefed.zipNot really, his name has been rumoured to be/somewhat known to be that for years now18
LLemvi lemmy.sdf.org3Hide 3 repliesReuters is still reporting on the epstein files, so what's wrong?47
RRetail4068 lemmy.worldhttps://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-house-panel-subpoenas-attorney-general-bondi-epstein-probe-2026-03-17/24
Diplomjodler lemmy.world1Hide 1 replyThe purpose of a modern journalist is to maintain the rule of the oligarchy.10
ooneser replylemmy.zipThis is such a lame take. Like there are a shitload of legitimately fantastic community investigative journalists fighting to make a difference, but you'd rather shit on them too because Rupert Murdoch exists.4
cceoofanarchism lemmy.dbzer0.comShouldn't have exposed someone who doesn't want to be exposed like this even though its basically already known.7
Gladaed feddit.orgYou know people don't have to laser focus on that one thing but spit their attention as a society and get more done that way? What of merit could a new Epstein related article have? They have been virtually the same for almost a decade.4
I mean, Banksy is actually a challenge, the Epstein files are just evident
Not really, his name has been rumoured to be/somewhat known to be that for years now
Reuters is still reporting on the epstein files, so what's wrong?
OP has the attention span of a mosquito at a funeral
Only one thing at a time!
Why find Banksy, a guy doing good? Why not do more about Epstein?
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-house-panel-subpoenas-attorney-general-bondi-epstein-probe-2026-03-17/
The purpose of a modern journalist is to maintain the rule of the oligarchy.
This is such a lame take. Like there are a shitload of legitimately fantastic community investigative journalists fighting to make a difference, but you'd rather shit on them too because Rupert Murdoch exists.
Shouldn't have exposed someone who doesn't want to be exposed like this even though its basically already known.
You know people don't have to laser focus on that one thing but spit their attention as a society and get more done that way?
What of merit could a new Epstein related article have? They have been virtually the same for almost a decade.