Spyke
mmmmreply
sopuli.xyz

fwiw and iirc her real name is not Sarah Andersen. Also there can be a chance OP found this image uncredited.

But yup, if it was credited and OP deliberately erased and ommited it, won't be cool

8
slrpnk.net

LadyButterfly generally always has artists credit left in the photo if it was there, I don't believe that they would've removed it

1

Fair enough, because it happened to me once - found a funny comic strip in FB or something and thought "this is great, I'll share this on Reddit" so fired up GIMP, translated it, credited the place I got it from and posted - but not long someone let the actual author of the comic to know and they commented something among the lines of "yeah, I was who actually did this, a bit sad that they're taking out my name but it's great it makes people laugh", and then the other people torched me. Fortunately I still had opened the place I got it in the first place and explained to them that I just translated it in a hurry and assumed the original author was the place I found it

3
Axolotlreply
feddit.it

I think they removed the watermark too (not sure tho, but usually Sarah Andreson leave their signature)

7
RustySharpreply
programming.dev

She usually does. But in this particular case:

  1. I couldn't find this colourised version on her Tumblr & Insta (only B&W).
  2. She has released a few special occasion colourised comics with no signature.

So I really don't know what's happened here... I'm really hoping it's not an unsanctioned AI colouring job, but an unsigned colour release from her somewhere.

9

I had a look yesterday and I couldn't find the colored ones with a signature as well. It seems they were a collaboration?

4

That's why cats and dogs are enemies one's always high and the other one is a snitch

2

You reached the end

There's the difference | Spyke