Spyke

Let the community vote. Get them onboarded and functioning now. If they don't work out, try another.

11
lemmy.ca

Perhaps a ranked voting system? Succession methodologies rarely work any better, and lead to all kinds of nepotism.

9
lemmy.world

We need nepotism in the Kernel, whomever takes over needs to be a long time developer with skills.

Elections are great for steering committees and such it not for a huge highly technical piece of software that powers the world

9

This might be one of the few cases where democracy won't actually work very well. If for no other reason than that I don't think we can actually define the community in any useful way.

Technocracy/meritocracy in this case is better, so long as disaffected groups can fork the kernel rather than be forced to accept what that leadership decides (they can).

1

You reached the end

Linus Torvalds jokingly ponders his successor as Linux boss | Spyke