To be fair it is really, really mentally taxing to be a young person who cares. You're surrounded by a world that doesn't. Everything is constructed to reward you if you simply stop. The effort to care is immense and the rewards are meager. The impact you can have on the world is so, so limited by your wealth, and wealth comes so, so easy if you just stop caring.

But you can't. I mean, you can't. If you stopped you wouldn't be you anymore, it would destroy your soul. But it is gnawing. You could do the grift just for a bit. Save up $10k, maybe $20k. That's life-changing money. How much good would it do to your family? Maybe you can forget that there are other families, ones you can't see, that would be hurt. Well no. You can't. You are better than that. And for that you will suffer.

A worldview where one's worth is measured by the balance in their bank account makes it really easy to flatten out morality.

I unfortunately do understand. I think there are severe tradeoffs between living a good life and living a virtuous life. Most people usually compromise to lesser or greater degree and find ways to cope with that. Nihilism is one way.

SQL Injections 🤝 Measles => Big Comeback Stories of 2026

this is a lot like my expectation. ai never goes away, it never becomes revolutionary, it just makes everything worse and supercharges scams and theft and spam and means of social and nonsocial murder forever with maybe some real but kind of marginal usecases idk

Since the advent of ChatGPT in November 2022, the number of monthly submissions to the arXiv preprint repository has risen by more than 50% and the number of articles rejected each month has risen fivefold to more than 2,400 (see ‘Rejection rates climb’).

If I'm interpreting this right then the growth in the number of rejections is wildly outpacing the growth in submissions, which means not only are we getting a tsunami of slop but that the bad papers are actively chasing away good ones.

There was an underlying tension with an academia, and a society, that takes "productivity" by itself as an end goal, and the autogenerators are just the logical conclusion/extreme form of that. The tiny part of of me that can still be optimistic hopes that this leads to a real good reexamination of what academia (and society) is even for.

@samvines @BlueMonday1984 I just hope that the manufacturers are insisting on cash now for future deliveries, rather than assuming that Altman will have the money in the future when the data center that doesn't exist using power from the powerplant that doesn't exist is ready to install the storage in the computers that don't exist.

@samvines @BlueMonday1984 isn't it funny how the whole AI tech sector is wildly unprofitable because the costs are unsustainable and... they're addressing the problem head on by collectively increasing them

@samvines @BlueMonday1984 I wish we could finally agree that tech bros (and MBAs!) are greedy, full of shit and ruining the planet. And then remove both groups from any place of influence. If tech bros in particular were reduced to the role of village idiot, the world would be a much better place.

@samvines @BlueMonday1984
If this is related to the AI datacenter construction boom then it is all being paid for by taking on more debt to build "future laserquest warehouses".
What could go wrong ?

@samvines @cstross I know. I ordered a replacement drive for my NAS at the weekend and was shocked at the prices already.

@samvines @BlueMonday1984

Unfortunately, my job has recently expanded to include writing offers for servers with our proprietary (non-AI) software.

And let me tell you, this fucking _sucks_ right now.

That was a good read.

Corey doc wrote:

It's not "unethical" to scrape the web in order to create and analyze data-sets. That's just "a search engine"

Equivocating what LLMs do and what goes into LLM web scraping with "a search engine" is messed up. His article that he links about scraping is mostly about how badly copyright works and how analysing trade-secret-walled data can be beneficial both to consumers and science but occasionally bad for citizen privacy, which you'll recognize as mostly irrelevant to the concerns people tend to have against LLM training data providers ddosing the fuck out of everything, and all the rest of the stuff tante does a good job of explaining.

Corey also provides this anecdote:

As a group of human-rights defending forensic statisticians, HRDAG has always relied on cutting edge mathematics in its analysis. With its Colombia project, HRDAG used a large language model to assign probabilities for responsibility for each killing documented in the databases it analyzed.

That is, HRDAG was able to rigorously and legibly say, “This killing has an X% probability of having been carried out by a right-wing militia, a Y% probability of having been carried out by the FARC, and a Z% probability of being unrelated to the civil war.”

The use of large language models — produced from vast corpuses of scraped data — to produce accurate, thorough and comprehensible accounts of the hidden crimes that accompany war and conflict is still in its infancy. But already, these techniques are changing the way we hold criminals to account and bring justice to their victims.

Scraping to make large language models is good, actually.

what the actual shit

edit: I mean, he tried transformer powered voice-to-text and liked it, and now he's all in on the LLMs are a rigorous and accurate tool actually bandwagon?

Also the web scraping article is from 2023 but CD linked it in the recent pluralistic post so I assume his views haven't changed.

as someone from a colonial country that never got the chance partake on the wealth of fossil fuel society but will take the brunt of its consequences as rich countries continue to burn carbon, what LLMs taught me is that "energy waste by the First World fucks up the Third, even more" does not even register as an ethical argument to the First World. like, it's some sort of purity argument not even worth considering, an extremist position of arguing abstractions and future hypotheticals, rather than, say, 478 cities in my country flooding with abnormal weather two years ago etc.

Good read, thanks.

Quick update: The post's popped off in the Fediverse, and Doctorow's actively posting through it in the replies.

EDIT: Tante's also written a follow-up post, trying to convince people to tone down their vitriol against Cory.

It's morgin' time

(credit)

wait, was this brain-rotting cognitive hazard posted at the linked page on microsoft dot com documentation? if so they have already removed it

edit: archive caught it

Two thoughts:

That this is not just some random AI generated graphic, but from official Microsoft tutorial is unpleasantly unsurprising.

I think the tinm (timn ?) axis goes the wrong way.

Microsoft is really putting the "git" in GitHub thanks to copilot.

That slopped-out "diagram" plagiarised Vincent Driessen’s “A successful Git branching model”, BTW.

Mighty Morgin' Power-Sloppers

Timn

yes, I certainly do know how to handle software development over Timn

it is actually kinda incredible that this shit has invented a way to be terrible that we can't actually easily riff off by what's expressable in unicode. an unholy clusterfuck of what would otherwise be be joked about as keming (but isn't because it's straight-up an artefact of the process used to encode visual data from source data, badly), a mindless automaton outputting garbage, and then also the shitty model

and people keep telling me this shit is good

You have to wonder about that Tim traveler; Merlin?

Using talking points meant for c-suites to a general audience and outing yourself as a complete psychopath, the San Fran CEO Story.

What's next, are the crypto bros gonna make some dumb talking point about how traditional finance also uses so much energy ... oh wait, they already did that.

The Atlantic has a take on this too. Sam Altman is Losing His Grip on Humanity.

Absolutely demented piece.

For all the talk about these people being "highly agentic", it is deeply ironic how all the shit they do has no meaning and purpose. I hear all this sound and fury about making millions off of ChatGPT wrappers, meeting senators in high school bathrooms, and sperm races (?), and I wonder what the point is. Silicon Valley hagiographies used to at least have a veneer that all of this was meaningful. Are we supposed to emulate anyone just because they happen to temporarily have a few million dollars?

Even though the material conditions of working in science are not good, I'd still rather do science than whatever the hell they're doing. I would be sick at the prospect of being a "highly agentic" person in a "new and possibly permanent overclass", where my only sense of direction is a vague voice in my head telling me that I should be optimizing my life in various random ways, and my only motivation is the belief that I have to win harder and score more points on the leaderboard. (In any case, I believe this "overclass" is a lot more fragile than the author seems to think.)

Somehow I had missed the boat on Donald Boat and now I have so many questions. Absolutely wild read.

I need a shower.

Missioned accomplished for him. Unleash a wave of toxic, community-destroying bots, get hired by Big Sam.

"fuck you, got mine"

completely unsurprised, cant wait to see what shitshow this produces

Congratulations to the maker of a tool that charges you $20 to remind you to buy milk the next morning.

@scruiser @BlueMonday1984 funny how they mock left wingers for «that wasn't real communism» and then come up with the same excuses for liberal democracies and capitalism whenever one points out all the shit that came out of that. It's really ALWAYS projection with them, isn't it?

Just another reminder of how the EA movement is full of right wing thinking and how most of it hasn’t considered even the most basic of leftist thought.

I continue to maintain that EA boils down to high-dollar consumerism focused on intangible goods. I'm sure that statement won't fly on LW or any other EA forum, but my thoughts on psychiatry don't fly at a Scientologist convention either.

It is a viable business and it fuels the spread of disinformation. Have you noticed that Old Media magazines have online wings that are full of random advertorials? That is because Google declared that they are Good Domains and upranked them so all the sleazy online marketing migrated to them.

That is also why people buy formerly respected domains and put casinos, propaganda, or virus-laden porn on them.

As far as I can tell, it's run by right-wing Russians who are willing to falsify or edit archived data and who attack anybody who looks into them.

unherd is a fash publication. to me this comes across as an AI take-ified rewrite of a 1994 luttwak essay i read recently, an endorsement of a revival of italian style fascism: https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v16/n07/edward-luttwak/why-fascism-is-the-wave-of-the-future

the Gen-Z men shut out by elite institutions often join their grandfathers and turn toward MAGA, or worse, into Groypers.

Iirc that is not as often true as people claim it is. But yeah, not gonna click unherd to see if they have a source. Because blergh unherd.

One ray of sunshine: when the bubble pops, there will be quite a few "billionaires" who will become mere millionaires, and they will find that their friends in government and the media will suddenly be much less interested in being around them at all.

Edit: This reply belongs somewhere else. apologies!

Beautiful. As a dad, thank you for sharing!

The post names Joscha Bach as someone Aella tried to exclude.

You do not under any circumstances have to hand it to Aella

At least we’re not like that

This was not such an effective venture.

Rip the stately home.

womp, and wait for it, womp

my current favorite trick for reducing "cognitive debt" (h/t @simonw ) is to ask the LLM to write two versions of the plan:

1. The version for it (highly technical and detailed)
2. The version for me (an entertaining essay designed to build my intuition)

I don't know about them, but I would be offended if I was planning something with a collaborator, and they decide to give me a dumbed down, entertaining, children's storybook version of their plan while keeping all the technical details to themselves.

Also, this is absolutely not what "cognitive debt" means. I've heard technical debt refers to bad design decisions in software where one does something cheap and easy now but has to constantly deal with the maintenance headaches afterwards. But the very concept of working through technical details? That's what we call "thinking". These people want to avoid the burden of thinking.

I think I understand it. Think of an alcoholic that's trying every sort of miracle hangover "cure" instead of drinking less.

@Soyweiser @BlueMonday1984 tag yourself I'm emailing HTML

@Soyweiser @BlueMonday1984 I like* how the structure of the boat changes from moment to moment. I like* how the radio dishes just beam from some random place between the transmitter and the dish. I like* that the original person who was waiting for a live stream doesn't get it (because it goes to a different group of people) and is just eating popcorn watching the mess unfold. I like* how the "audience" have their backs to the "live stream" screen and are excited to be looking away from it.

E: If they all hate programming so much, perhaps a change of job is in question, sure might not pay as much, but it might make them happier.

Surely at least a few of them have worked up enough seed capital to try their hand at used-car dealerships. I can attest that the juicier markets just outside the Bay Area are fairly saturated, but maybe they could push into lesser-served locales like Lost Hills or Weaverville.

Every time an LLM-related package appears on ELPA I die a little more inside.

This is why CCC being able to compile real C code at all is noteworthy. But it also explains why the output quality is far from what GCC produces. Building a compiler that parses C correctly is one thing. Building one that produces fast and efficient machine code is a completely different challenge.

Every single one of these failures is waved away because supposedly it's impressive that the AI can do this at all. Do they not realize the obvious problem with this argument? The AI has been trained on all the source code that Anthropic could get their grubby hands on! This includes GCC and clang and everything remotely resembling a C compiler! If I took every C compiler in existence, shoved them in a blender, and spent $20k on electricity blending them until the resulting slurry passed my test cases, should I be surprised or impressed that I got a shitty C compiler? If an actual person wrote this code, they would be justifiably mocked (or they're a student trying to learn by doing, and LLMs do not learn by doing). But AI gets a free pass because it's impressive that the slop can come in larger quantities now, I guess. These Models Will Improve. These Issues Will Get Fixed.

can all of rationalism be reduced to logorrhea with load-bearing extreme handwaving (in this case, agentic self preservation arises through RL scaling)?

the screenshot is very very clearly LLM generated right? This is so insanely stupid

Apparently this sort of machine learning training pitfall I learned about a decade go in an undergraduate level class that I was like halfway paying attention to in a party school is now evidence of the impending AI apocalypse.

Wow, that highlighting really emphasises the insidious, nefarious behaviour. This is only a hop, skip, and jump away from, what was it again? Rhomboid? Rheumatoid bactothefuture?

Most expensive number 2 generator

rolls 1, 1

I behold the paperclip calculator, and tremble in fear

Notes that I thought about related to this, just some context:

1. Joshua Sutter is the son of the owner of the former Southern Patriot Shop in South Carolina. He founded the Tempel ov Blood chapter of the Order of Nine Angles, a Neo-Nazl Satanist group. He was outed in 2021 as having been a federal informant since 2005, which is to say he still does the same Nazi shit, but gets paid by the FBI to do it.

2. One of the core practices of the O9A is entryism into other groups, especially other cultish ones. In that context, you'd kind of be surprised to not see O9A people in Rat circles.

You briefly got my hopes up that was a feature of the bill and not the feature he was suggesting to fix the bill...

the AI safety crowd cuts Anthropic way too much slack. Oh, they’re not running CSAM-generating MechaHitler? Oh, they’re not collaborating with the US government to recreate 1984? I’m so proud of them for doing the bare minimum. They still took donations from the UAE and Qatar (something Dario Amodei himself admitted was going to hurt a lot of people, but he took the donations anyways because “they couldn’t miss out on all those valuations”), they still downloaded hundreds of pirated content to train their chatbot. They’re still doing shady shit, don’t let them off the hook because they’re slightly less evil than the competition

In economic terms it's less rent seeking and more rent creation. Like, taking advantage of public sidewalk space may not be a rent in the strictest sense given that the revenue model is still people paying for the service, but the ability to provide that service is absolutely predicated on taking over and monopolizing this public resource to the maximal degree possible.

By historical allegory, harkening back to the original destruction of the Commons, we're looking at Enclosure 2: Frisco Drift.

Let's also not lose sight of the fact that those sidewalks aren't a natural formation, and that it's the city government who ultimately takes on the burden of their construction and maintenance. This kind of neo-enclosure of public resources is then another kind of invisible subsidy.

parasitech?

"even safer" in this case means some combination of two things:

1. The new organization is more ideologically aligned with the transhumanist doom cult that apparently managed to eat the brains of the people with money to burn.

2. The new organization, largely as a result of this, is capable of sinking an unending amount of capital into buying compute time and Nvidia chips but due to their commitments to safety is even less inclined to actually deliver anything.

the capital to fund their own, even safer labs.

I wonder, is this a theory of "safety" analogous to what's driven the increased gigantism of vehicles in the US? Sure seems like it.

So they've highlighted an interesting pattern to compensation packages, but I find their entire framing of it gross and disgusting, in a capitalist techbro kinda way.

Like the way the describe Part III's case study:

The uncapped payouts were so large that it fractured the relationship between Capital (Activision) and Labor (Infinity Ward).

Acitivision was trying to cheat its labor after they made them massively successful profits! Describing it as a fracture relationship denies the agency on the Acitivision's part to choose to be greedy capitalist pigs.

The talent that left formed the core of the team that built Titanfall and Apex Legends, franchises that have since generated billions in revenue, competing directly in the same first-person shooter market as Call of Duty.

Activision could have paid them what they owed them, and kept paying them incentive based payouts, and come out billions of dollars ahead instead of engaging in short-sighted greedy behavior.

I would actually find this article interesting and tolerable if they framed it as "here are the perverse incentives capitalism encourages businesses to create" instead of "here is how to leverage the perverse incentives in your favor by paying your employees just enough, but not enough to actually reward them a fair share" (not that they were honest enough to use those words).

WTF is “even safer” ??? how bout we like just don’t create the torment nexus.

I think the writer isn't even really evaluating that aspect, just thinking in terms of workers becoming capital owners and how companies should try to prevent that to maximize their profits. The idea that Anthropic employees might care on any level about AI safety (even hypocritically and ineffectually) doesn't enter into the reasoning.

It does seem more and more like the most relevant parallel is radicalization, particularly the concerns about algorithmic radicalization and stochastic terrorism we got back in the early 2010s. The machine system feeds the user back what they've put into it, validating that input and pushing the user into more extreme positions. When it happens through a community ("classical" radicalization) the fact that the community needs to persist serves to mediate or at least slow the destructive elements of the spiral. Your Nazi book club/street gang stops meeting if people go to prison, lose their jobs/homes, etc. Online communities reduce this friction and allow the spiral to accelerate to a great degree, but the group can still start eating itself if it accepts the wrong level of unhingedness and toxicity.

Algorithmic/Stochastic radicalization, where the user moves through a succession of media environments and (usually online) communities can allow things to accelerate even more because the user no longer actually has to maintain long-term social ties to remain engaged in the spiral. Rather than increasingly-destructive ideas echoing around a social space, the user can chase them across communities, with naive content algorithms providing a solid nudge in the right direction (pun wholly intended). However, the spiral is still dependent on the ability of the relevant media figures and communities to persist, even if the individual users no longer need a persistent connection to them. If the market doesn't have space for a creator then their role in that network drops. Getting violent or destructive content deplatformed also helps slow down the spiral by adding friction back into the process of jumping to the next level of radicalism. Past a certain point you find yourself back in the world of needing to maintain a community because the ideology has gotten so rotten that there's no profit in entertaining it. Past that you end up back with in-person or otherwise high-friction high-trist groups because the openness of a low-friction online community compromises internal security in ways that can't be allowed when you're literally doing crimes.

Chatbot-induced radicalization combines the extreme low friction of online interactions with an extremely high value validation and a complete lack of social restrictions. You don't have to retain a baseline connection to reality to maintain a relationship with a chatbot. You don't have to make connections and put in the work to find a chatbot to validate your worst impulses the same way that you do to join a militia. Your central cause doesn't have to be something to motivate anyone outside yourself. Your local KKK chapter probable has more on its agenda than hating your ex-wife (not that it doesn't make the list, of course), but your chatbot instance will happily give you an even stronger echo chamber no matter how narrow the focus. And unlike the stigma associated with the kinds of hate groups and cults that would normally fill this role for people, the entire weight if the trillion-dollar tech industry seems to be invested in promoting these chatbots as reliable and trustworthy -- even more so than the experts and institutions that are supposed to provide an anchor to counter this kind of descent. That's the most dangerous part of our Very Good Friends' projects on the matter. That's how you get relatively normal people to act like they're talking to God and He',s telling them everything they don't want to admit they want to hear.

yawn, i diagnose that LWer with weeb. this is something happening across entire industrialized world, causes being high performance mechanization of agriculture, old people being stubborn in regards to moving, lack of specialized work in countryside and couple of other factors. germany has patched their hospice staff shortage (not sure how effectively) with migrants, but japanese are way too racist for that. same thing happens in moldova, but you never hear sob stories about retired moldovans because they're broke and nobody cares, while moldovan govt can't really do much about it (because broke) to degree that it has not just economic and demographic, but even strategic effects. whole lotta drs strangelove in there

Someone in the comments used an ?AI-powered? fact-checking tool to push back on some of the claims that inheriting an old house in Japan is a burden. I especially doubt that the land the house is on is worth nothing.

It is miserable to live in a dying town or village and many people talk about this problem in Italy, Moldova, Canada, and other countries.

Not beating the 'this is just Christianity with the labels removed' allegations.

We're doing revolutionary calendars, huh?

In March 2025, the large language model (LLM) GPT-4.5, developed by OpenAI in San Francisco, California, was judged by humans in a Turing test to be human 73% of the time — more often than actual humans were. Moreover, readers even preferred literary texts generated by LLMs over those written by human experts.

do you know how hard it is to write something that aged poorly months before it was written? it’s in the public consciousness that LLMs write like absolute shit in ways that are very easy to pick out once you’ve been forced to read a bunch of LLM-extruded text. inb4 some asshole with AI psychosis pulls out “technically ChatGPT’s more human than you are, look at the statistics” regarding the 73% figure I guess. but you know when statistics don’t count!

A March 2025 survey by the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence in Washington DC found that 76% of leading researchers thought that scaling up current AI approaches would be ‘unlikely’ or ‘very unlikely’ to yield AGI

[…] What explains this disconnect? We suggest that the problem is part conceptual, because definitions of AGI are ambiguous and inconsistent; part emotional, because AGI raises fear of displacement and disruption; and part practical, as the term is entangled with commercial interests that can distort assessments.

no you see it’s the leading researchers that are wrong. why are you being so emotional over AGI. we surveyed Some Assholes and they were pretty sure GPT was a human and you were a bot so… so there!

@o7___o7 @techtakes It was Arduino who emitted the llm generated circuit but I was tired and conflated two companies with similar names (whose products I don't use) before going to bed. Now they're trying to throw a flame war. Pay no attention.

they’ve jumped the shark a while back. ptorrone is relatively widely documented to go around harassing people (often using his partner as a shield excuse for doing so, just like this time), and a couple months back they sold to qualcomm

This person “Charlie Stross”

ah yes, that absolutely must be a pseudonym, and absolutely couldn’t be a real person

such a fucking weird bit

anyway yeah fuck adafruit. don’t buy their shit, there are other options (and often cheaper)

e: I derped on the who-sold, conflated the two for dipshittery. see subthread

Limor Fried and I had a class together at MIT in 2001. This has no bearing on the present circumstances and offers me no real insight (anything I could say about our extremely limited interactions would amount to confirmation bias). It's just the odd little factoid that comes to mind whenever adafruit Does Something Online.

2020s as the decade where tech stopped progressing in the way we know it

I mean, sure, but I think the underlying cause here is the end of Moore's law and exponential growth of potential userbases as the world becomes fully connected. The Enshittocene can be viewed as a consequence of capital's attempts to continue exponential growth while the fundamentals are no longer capable of sustaining it.

The phrase "ambient AI listening in our hospital" makes me hear the "Dies Irae" in my head.

I'm personally hearing "Morceaux" myself.

Jason is great and well worth a follow.

Quoting from this post:

But, what Proof Of Concept and I have been realizing over the past couple weeks is that current LLMs are 100% capable of all of this, with the right bootstrap instructions and a bit of tools. That's why POC has been able to, quite successfully, take over a huge amount of the day to day - she's got a pretty good idea of what she's good at, and what needs my involvement. I am just a bit scared to release our work because I don't want to be known as the guy who inflicted Sirius Corporation's Genuine People Personalities on the world 🤣

Ah. He has been "one-shotted", as the kids say.

So take your codebase, compress it as a zip at normal compression level, and then think how large the output problem space is, shrink it down quadratically, and you have a good estimate of how much ctx you need for LLMs to solve the hardest problems in your codebase at any given point during token generation

wat

I can see what they're going for but that seems .... wildly guess-y?

Goertzel discusses with Epstein future scenario for "an AGI economy":

"for the AGI parasite to overcome to regular-human-economy host (so it can grow to be more than a parasite and eventually gain its own superhuman autonomy) it first needs to suck off the resources of the host"

The Rationalists!

CS 2005 is absolutely worth it, it's a version of Photoshop that does everything you actually need including CMYK with Pantone.

can somebody tell me whether neovim is selling out to LLMs or led by transphobes or getting money from Anduril or something, so I decide whether to switch before getting disappointed again

@antifuchs @techtakes Oh goodie they enshittified vim IS NOTHING SACRED?!? HAVE WE LIVED AND FOUGHT IN VAIN?!?!?

@antifuchs s/is using AI/is being used for AI/g
There’s a big difference!

@antifuchs @BlueMonday1984 I didn't read it that way?

Only some guy demonstrated the ease of use of some vim script constructs using LLM? The rest seems just algorithms and pattern matching to me.

Yeah I'm your average emacs hater.

(Yeah there seem to be LLM plugins, some of them maybe can brew coffee?)

I grow increasingly frustrated every time one of these ponderous essays fails to mention the gutter racist and eugenicist beliefs of these people. This dilution of what 'far right' means only serves their interests, and it's malpractice to not mention that the racism is foundational to their origin and organization as a movement.

I expect better of the New Yorker; it's disappointing to see their writers following the path of the New York Times.

This reminds me of when Steve Jobs would introduce every new Mac release by talking about how fast it could render in Photoshop. I wonder how he would do in our brave new era of completely ass-pulling your own bespoke benchmark frameworks.

Time to say 'Sneerclub was correct' a lot, so we can frontload the 'factcheckers'.

We are in the singularity this is so hard to explain to people.

Describes a normal thing, a think also talked about for several decades in science fiction now.

Amazing the singularity term has now been downgraded to "ai stuff that is hard to explain to laymen".

Thet think their incremental innovations are radical.

the full paper is here: https://x.com/alexwg/status/2022292731649777723 immediately two references to Nick Bostrom and Scott Alexander

more proof that crypto scammers have metastasized to AI scammers

See also https://awful.systems/post/7311930

@BlueMonday1984

Rishi Sunak, a man with his finger 100% on the pulse https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/apr/04/rishi-sunak-asks-royal-mint-to-create-nft

[email protected] update: quokka reached out to me and apparently you had been banned on another instance for report abuse and that ban had synchronised to quokk.au. You should be unbanned now which means the next stubsack should federate again.

E: I do not know how tags work E2: why does that format to a mailto link?