Nigel Farage has 41 mentions in the Epstein Files and counting
cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/16366
https://www.thecanary.co/trending/2025/12/30/nigel-farage-41-mentions-in-the-epstein-files/Open linkView original on lemmy.caSyndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.
View original on lemmy.cahttps://www.thecanary.co/trending/2025/12/30/nigel-farage-41-mentions-in-the-epstein-files/Open linkView original on lemmy.ca
42 replies
This bit is interesting too (from a tweet quoted in the article):
I'm assuming Epstein just thought that Tommy Robson was a loose cannon and shouldn't be brought into the inner circle. Given the fact that at least half his prosecutions have been entirely self-inflicted that's not a necessarily un realistic point of view.
Gotta rape some kids and enter mutual blackmail if you wanna be somebody in the West.
Well he's deffo got the resting paedo face going on.
Fucking hell, with that chinless wonder of a face it'd be more of a surprise if he wasn't a nonce.
Bless you for providing us with this nightmare fuel. Now if you don't mind I'm going to go bore this image out of my brain with a power drill.
What an absolutely horrible day to have eyes...
Let's have a show of hands: who expected one of the worst men on the planet to also be a pedo? Oh, all of you? Makes sense.
If you read the article he doesn't seem to have been involved with the rape/trafficking, just right political connections
Seems like he might've been interested:
I assume you don't really think this quote is Farage accidentally letting slip that he'd quite like to have been in on the child rape, but I'm struggling to see what your point is otherwise.
It's more about the fact that he's prepared to go along with it to further his own aspirations then he's necessarily into it himself. Not that that's much of a improvement.
Throwing other people under the bus for his own betterment is 100% on brand for him. Is absolutely able to turn a blind eye to the most appalling abuse if he thinks it'll further his objectives. It's the same reason people think he took Russian money, because obviously the Russians would have approached him and he's incredibly selfish and greedy so he would have taken the money if offered.
It's always the people you think it's going to be isn't it.
Yet people are excited to vote reform the most when their “anti-elite” talk is bogus, if you thought Brexit was bad oh boy just you wait…
He's going to burn the UK to the ground, but whilst holding a pint. What an everyman.
Certainly Vlad has the info on his UKIP Sock Puppet.
Like receipts of all he has bought for him.
Usual suspects
Let me know if there's evidence he diddled kids, rather than being associated with someone who did...
Meantime there is actual news about how awful farage is.
I think the network of connections is still significant even if there's no evidence he was raping kids. Epstein to Bannon to Farage and Tommy Robinson: there's money from all over the world concentrated through these people into undermining the UK and other democracies.
@floofloof @FishFace the Quiet Riot podcast was discussing their utter consternation (surprise is the wrong word) that in the same year Starmer couldn't accept so much as a pair of trousers from a donor, and Reeves and Rayner were being leapt on for everything, Farage has accepted a £9m crypto donation (90% of Reform's funding for the year) and nobody has pushed him on what influence that has bought, or what went on with Nathan Gill and the Russian bribes.
What is there concrete?
There is BOUND to be dodgy money (quite possibly not illegal money due to the UK's weak laws in this area) funding farage but just being mentioned alongside these other fucks isn't evidence of it
🤣😂😅 if you've come here for evidence you're in for a rude awakening my friend.
To me it comes down to how often. Sure maybe you went to a party before anyone knew about this guy once or even went to his island or something when he invited you but I find it hard to believe someone went to his island and decided to go back or keep hanging with him or going to his parties. Had to have some wierd vibes there.
Epstein just had political analysis reports which were talking about Brexit. He wasn't associated to Epstein.
Go to jail go directly to jail don’t pass go don’t collect $200
Please God let him be arrested for this.
If you actually RTFA you’ll find it’s just mentions through Bannon, nothing to do with any trips to any islands.
That we know of.
But yeah; the guy is clearly funded by Russian and right wing nefarious funding basically trying to overthrow the world order.
I do not want to create sudden extreme nausea syndrome, but, his face and smile approaching any young woman or underaged gir with intent to abuse.
So there's a "Epstein Filesier"?
It’s funny how this stuff would be surprising but at the same time, nope. Not surprising at all.
How surprising ha ha!
The only source I can find on this is the canary, not totally convincing.
Tbf, they list their source at the top of the article, which is a site collating the Epstein list references to various individuals for easier public review. Here's Farages profile, which they were referring to for this article:
https://epsteinsecrets.com/entities/996786.
So it's not like this is some journalist making up arbitrary numbers... The source is readily available for scrutiny.
So it's a massive nothingburger. Sounds like epstein was subscribed to some form of political mailing list or something.
If you consider the worlds most prolific peadophile ring having a clear interest in promoting right wing populism throughout Europe and the US to be nothing, then that's a perfectly valid opinion to have. But it's not one I'd agree with personally.
I thought that was obvious though? Still don't like the headline though, it implies Farage was being a nonce.
Kinda funny how QAnon was all about how the leftists were a massive paedophile ring but it's true about the right...
Necroing week old posts all cause I hit a nerve? Ain't you precious
"the mod". Bruh, this ain't truthsocial. Each instance has its own moderation. Not surprised the nuance is lost on yourself though.