Spyke
lemmy.cafe

He genocided his own country's people too. All around bad guy, with or without an association with Hitler

19

That it even needs to be discussed if he was a good guy, WTF.

(hell no, in case that was confusing)

5
BlackLaZoRreply
fedia.io

Arguably he was worse. His total kill count is probably higher

3

Yeah, I mean, the numbers are just an indication of how much opportunity they had to massacre people.

It's not like there's a big ethical gap between someone who will kill 5 million and someone who'll kill 10 million. At that point, you'll just keep going until someone stops you.

5
PugJesusreply
piefed.social

Stalin also had more time to do it and a larger country to do it with.

Hitler managed ~10 million by execution in ~5 years, and less directly caused another ~20 million in that same time period, with plans to continue it indefinitely if he won the war. Stalin would've had to murder the entire population of the USSR to match Hitler's rate of killing - not coincidentally, that was Hitler's long-term goal if he won.

Stalin was bad. Stalin was one of the worst human beings to ever disgrace this planet, and deserved a noose.

But Hitler was worse.

10
BlackLaZoRreply
fedia.io

Ultimately, Mao takes the cake anyway, as he managed to starve 15-55mln in just two years

6

Irrespective of his association with the Allies, Stalin was a genocidal madman. Fuck Stalin in the ass with the largest cactus from Sahara.

Phew, that was therapeutic.

5
lemmy.ml

It's funny how you never see the tankies here in the comments section.

Have you considered cross posting to the .ml "memes" community, which has essentially become a tankie propaganda circle jerk?

3
PugJesusreply
piefed.social

I actually quite prefer them to stay in their own circlejerks. It's why I avoid .ml comms altogether.

I have no interest in sitting down at a table with 9 Nazis red fash.

5

You reached the end

Maybe don't assist the Nazis and then genocide Poland or something, idk | Spyke