Spyke
lemmy.ml

The student didn't use a technical nor scientific process to address the scenarios from the original assigned reading. This is a psychology course grounded in logic and scientific processes. The student was asked to practice the use of researching positions and supporting arguments with data, prior research, and logical structures. The student did not do that work so it's an F, regardless of what they wrote or the position they take on the topic.

In my ethics class I made it clear from day 1 that some students would take or hold positions I disagreed with. I also made it clear that their work would be judged on the rigor of their reasoning and the quality of the use of supporting works, not my opinion. I failed some papers that I agreed with because they were emotional outbursts (like our OU student's work) and passed ones that I detested (because they used the right process and forms to argue a case).

If OU's leadership doesn't back the use of science, logic, and formal argument in a course designed to teach scientific principles, then the school isn't a University of Merit anymore. It's just a religious shit hole like Liberty University and any graduates should be treated as with as much regard. But it is in Oklahoma so the locals will likely be mostly okay with their children being ill educated if it protects their incorrect Bronze Age worldviews.

64
shalafireply
lemmy.world

I'm a bit surprised this is Oklahoma University. This is the major private university, never had a poor reputation to my knowledge. Oklahoma State University is, well, the state school, not prestigious.

3
lemmy.world

Is there another OU because the one I am familiar with is/was a (respectable) public university

1
shalafireply
lemmy.world

I'm wrong! OU is public. Somehow I got the impression, 35-years ago, that OU was private and OSU was public. Know the difference? Did something change?

2

to my knowledge, in the states if it has the name of the state in the university, it's public. i'm sure there's an exception to that, but that's what things looked like 20 years ago the last time i really checked

1
joekar1990reply
lemmy.world

Wow, based on the actual assignment direction she didn't meet expectations at all. The TA who was suspended gave great feedback for the paper to correct it.

48

Yes, but for Republican hate groups weaponizing their fear and ignorance is critical.

They love to co-opt the basic principles behind social justice, unfortunately it only ever turns out to be "Oh geez I'm offended, you need to hurt."

7

So I guess what this means is that anyone graduating Oklahoma University could be presumed to have coasted through by sprinkling bigotry into their assignments as a way to ward off bad grades

24
Ava
piefed.blahaj.zone

that the review process “has been activated,” and that the graduate instructor was placed on administrative leave “to ensure fairness.”

In pursuit of fairness, I think it's reasonable to label the Oklahoma University a bigot-friendly institution. Just while the investigation is ongoing, you understand. Certainly this shouldn't be construed as punitive.

21

Was the student also suspended in pursuit of fairness? Is it fair to the students that paid to take the course having their professor suspended for a witch hunt? Of course not.

10

I'd have an easier time seeing this at OSU, not OU. SOURCE: Former Cowboy.

2
thelemmy.club

Oklahoma not be one of the shittiest states challenge: IMPOSSIBLE

14

You reached the end

Oklahoma University instructor suspended for failing student’s unscientific anti-trans psychology essay | Spyke