Data you are supposed to be observing the behavior of 21st century humans, not interacting with them. You are in danger of violating the temporary prime directive. We don't want another Sarjenka incident.
deposit is the only acceptable thing here… rent? no way! you don’t pay rent per person in the house. the landlord is losing nothing per month for your pet
the potential damages come from the additional deposit/bond
32 replies
...is your taxonomic nomenclature.
Data you are supposed to be observing the behavior of 21st century humans, not interacting with them. You are in danger of violating the temporary prime directive. We don't want another Sarjenka incident.
That's my cat's name...
Do you know if they actually check? My leopard has let himself go a bit and may not be typical.
Perhaps it's cumulative. 200lbs worth of cats total.
That’s a lot of cats.
The last line says 2 pets max. So two small Snow Leopards maybe?
Sad Khajiit noises...
Happy 185LB Khajiit noises!
This one weighs 83.914 kilos though.
It costs 400,000 treats to feed this cat… for 12 seconds.
If I let my Leopard eat the landlord's face I won't pay any rent. Sounds good.
$35 a month pet rent...
Fuck the capitalistic system, may the landlord's all die.
Do you have the address been looking for somewhere to rent that i can keep my Leopard?
So a small female leopard would be allowed?
Two leopards, there’s a two pet limit!
If you pay the $250 deposit and $35/month pet rent. 👍
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meow_(cat)
What if my tiger is still a baby? 🤔
That's fine, but once it's past the limit, do NOT attempt to flush it away. It will be very mad at you for turning it into a wet claw tornado.
Monthly pet rent?! Is this a pet sitter?
they would charge per occupant if it wasn't for those regressive pro child birthing laws
I would assume it's rent and that's why there is a 2 pet limit. Kind of insane.
I don't think ita unreasonable to do so, but it should not be in addition to the deposit. Should be one or the other.
Like, over time it's more likely for damage from pets to build up and can easily get over $250 after a year or two.
But good luck getting over $250 damage in 2-3 months.
So I would see it reasonable to charge per month per pet, in the assumption that there will be damages to fix building up over time.
deposit is the only acceptable thing here… rent? no way! you don’t pay rent per person in the house. the landlord is losing nothing per month for your pet
the potential damages come from the additional deposit/bond
So a pet should have a deposit or added rent but not a child? Or a second tenant? Is none of this the point of an overall damage deposit
Slippery fuckin slope.
landlord can't legally charge more for children
Hmm I wonder why, maybe because they tried and people were sensible enough to push back.
Seems reasonable
The extra fees may sound unfair, but as long as my baby can scout her own food it all balances out.
Well, it said "Cat Cat".
People should turn the autotranslator down. And stop messing with word capitalization!
If you can get a tiger through the door, I don't think anyone is going to argue with it.