Spyke
slrpnk.net

Always had a soft spot for Mageia, as I thought their Admin panel was an improvement compared to SUSE's.

But unfortunately I think they are slowly dying. Their forum is a ghost town, and besides their Admin panel, there isn't anything compelling about Mageia that would make me consider it over other options.

7

Because of the Redhat incident, I started to see people asking for community-based distros without a corporate that dominates the community. And, Mageia is one of them. So, I hope it will be more popular.

5
kbin.social

I honestly think we need community-managed LTS distros. This is a good start.

3
slrpnk.net

Doesn't Debian already effectively fill that niche? The 18 months of support that Mageia has isn't very LTS compared to Debian's 5 years.

7
Animortisreply
kbin.social

Debian supports their version for two years. Then you need to upgrade.

But I just think more options are always good. Only having one just limits us to a mono-culture if we don't want to go with some corporate solution.

3
slrpnk.net

Debian supports their version for two years. Then you need to upgrade.

According to this, All Debian releases since Debian 6 have had LTS support, which extends support for a total of 5 years.

6

If that's your argument, Mageia only supports each of the version for two years since release.

I do agree that diversity is good tho.

2

Nice, I love Mageia. I recommend anyone still distrohopping to give it a shot.

3
  • KDE is the default. So, for KDE users, Mageia with KDE was tested.
  • Mageia comes with Drake tools for configuring almost everything. IMO *drakes look quite friendly. Since they have been around for 20+ years, they must be stable.
  • Each release will be supported for 18 months, which is longer than Fedora.
14

More like what Ubuntu is ( relative to Debian ). They both started a long time ago and have gone their own way.

3

You reached the end

Mageia 9 released | Spyke