Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.zip
pluribus·PluribusbyPluribus

Pluribus - 1x05 "Got Milk" - Episode Discussion

Seaon 1 Episode 5: Got Milk

Air Date: November 26, 2025

Synopsis: Carol doubles down on her investigation—loneliness be damned. Meanwhile, howls in the night reveal a new source of danger.

Directed by: Gordon Smith

Written by: Ariel Levine

View original on lemmy.zip
28

18 replies

Thoughts:

  1. Rhea Seehorn can totally carry an episode by herself. That was pretty epic in and of itself.
  2. The drone fail 😅
  3. I found it interesting how "they" firewalled themselves from Carol by only communicating by recording and interacting via drones. Carol definitely seems to have spooked them.
  4. Granted, she did drug and nearly kill one of them so can't blame "them"
  5. I wonder what was on the second take of the second video we saw her record?
  6. I'm sad I didn't wait a bit longer to watch this episode because it's going to be even longer before we ind out what she found at the food packaging plant.
14
lemmy.world

It's gotta be wild to be dumped by the whole planet, that message they recorded for her that played every time she called was too much lol.

14
Etnaphelereply
lemmy.world

I expected she would have just asked to shorten that message so that she can get to them faster :D

11

Sorry for the late post, I thought this episode would release on friday 😅

12

Her face at the end there was amazing. I am so anxious for the reveal of what she saw. What do you guys think? Is it a soylent green situation? I feel like that would be too expected.

12
veeereply
lemmy.ca

I think it could be a Soylent Green misdirect, but only because I want to believe that Vince Gilligan is smarter than spelling out the twist this way. Until we find out more next week my guess is the bodies are being Aqua cremated. How the milk cartons are involved is anyone’s guess.

9

The Others constantly talk about efficiency and they never are seen burying the dead, just taking them away. So dead people are recycled, because burying perfectly good meat is waste.

9

It is so fricking thrilling, such a cliffhanger! Really looking forward to the discovery, hoping that it won’t be the obvious

6

Was that Howard (Patrick Fabian) from Better Call Saul on the voice recording in the beginning?? IMDb doesn’t list him here, but it sounded just like him.

6
lemmy.zip

I hope Carol will do collab with the greatest vlogger of all time, Lalo Salamanca.

It was quite a leap to go from powder bag to dog food factory.

Maybe next episode will have more reveals, so if Carol saw dead bodies it will be the smallest of surprises awaiting us.

6
BennyIncreply
feddit.org

Regarding the leap: she did probably just imagine this as working similarly to the milk cartons: they reuse some other factory, but in this case could omit the labeling. So she browsed the store, looking for a similar bag.

6

It seemed to me that the barcode was under the dog food label, and she had to discet the bag to find it. I would assume that the barcode was from the manufacturer of the bags and not the dog food, and that's why it didn't register in Sprouts. Kinda like how Amazon boxes have like 6 barcodes on them, but one of them corresponds to the UPS tracking number, and to UPS, all the other barcodes are ignored

4

Good point. That would still have required her to check out the correct package with the label for the address, while seeming more logical.

3
lemmy.zip

The CGI was so bad this episode. The blurred rooftop scene, the wolves — they looked completely unrealistic. With 15 million per episode, they could have either hired better graphics artists or used real animals. This episode broke something for me. Like… I can see now that Gilligan isn’t perfect.

I thought of Soylent Green the moment Zosia revealed that 800 million people (10% of the global population) died during the conversion. It seems like a logical step to use them as food rather than bury useful nutrients. I personally wouldn’t care, but it would be hilarious if this fact ended up helping Carol gain support from a few people who are still unaffected. “You consume the consciousness and personality of people? We don’t care. You consume the flesh of people? No, no, no, you can’t do THAT.”

Question, though: is it even possible to turn flesh into this kind of grain/dust/powder? Why not just eat the flesh directly—make “human jerky” or something like that? I mean… as humans we don’t consume or produce meat in the form of liquid or dissolvable powder; it’s too hard to make and not very feasible. Why did they decide to make it a powder specifically? Just for the plot? Really strange, considering Gilligan’s love for science and chemistry.

6

The CGI was so bad this episode. The blurred rooftop scene, the wolves — they looked completely unrealistic. With 15 million per episode, they could have either hired better graphics artists or used real animals.

I guess if you ignore the plot and acting, you pay attention to this.

5
Etnaphelereply
lemmy.world

On the last part: I guess they would extract essential nutrients from bodies and other sources like fruits and vegetables and process them into a powder with much longer shelf life and ease of storage.

Edit: and I would add that it looks more like crystals, isn’t it?

5

I'm late here, just watched E5. I can think of nothing else to give Carol the shock reaction than human remains of some sort. Yet I sense she has the wrong idea somehow.

I bet we'll have to wait awhile to find out. The title card for E6 has the Mauritanian guy on it, and this episode was almost entirely Carol.

1

You reached the end