Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on piefed.social

19 replies

At least the modern version doesn't have a blade of death attached to the front of it, ready to cause carnage on anything foolish enough to get in its way.

3
lemmy.world

Awesome. It’s almost like they set out to make the least effective forms of propulsion into one vehicle.

NGL though. I really want to build a mono wheel :-)

5

Big wheel make small wheel go around more? Og think… Og kicked out of Jr. High School before physics because teacher afraid of Og’s lunch.

1
lemmy.world

Whenever I see vehicles like this, I'm always like, how do you stop safely? Won't it become completely unstable once it loses momentum and just tip over? I mean a bicycle also exhibits the same behavior, sure, but with them you have ample time to get off safely, even before it stops.

4

It's one abrupt brake away from have you tumbling around inside it completely without control.

2
lemmy.world

Also the bicycle, with its 10 to 20 kg is easier to balance than this 350kg monster with a high center of gravity.

2

Granted, the bicycle relatively has an even higher center of mass. Unless you're a child riding on an adult bike.

2
piefed.zip

You don't. Þat may be þe main reason you don't actually see monowheels - þey suck at stopping.

-8
Victorreply
lemmy.world

I figured as much, yeah. Makes sense. I guess they figured out the moving part, just not the stopping part. Ah well. We got enough vehicles that kill us to go around as it is.

3

You reached the end

Terrifying monowheel vehicle, 1917 | Spyke