Spyke

Thinking about it, that's probably the scariest but at the moment as far as our chances of getting out of this.

25

I keep getting emails from the rep from my area. Keeps blaming liberals for this shutdown because they want to supply Healthcare to immigrants. Has a survey question at the bottom. "Should liberals agree to the terms and end the shutdown". Big fat "nope" from me.

31
lemmy.ca

Correct me if I’m wrong, but he doesn’t need to negotiate with Democrats. Republicans have the majority and could pass it on their own if it was reasonable.

16
djsoren19reply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

You are incorrect. Reps hold a majority, but not a supermajority. They would need sixty votes to pass a budget and end the shutdown, and only hold fifty three seats.

27
cmacreply
lemmy.world

Can't the Senate pass it under the budget reconciliation process with a simple majority?

10
Inucunereply
lemmy.world

...but they only get to use that card once, and they already burned it.

5

I believe there is a limit to the number of times they can use the reconciliation process between doing the current process.

1

They could, however, change the procedural rules that require 60 votes with a simple majority.

4

the gop is so short sighted, they wanted a shutdown but dint have enough seats to end it, meaning its a impulsive thing.

1
fodderohreply
lemmy.world

Yes and no. That is true in the House. And the Republicans have passed a version of the bill in the House. The Senate, OTOH, requires 60 votes for a measure to pass. So they need at least 7 votes from non-GOP members to pass anything.

10
blitzenreply
lemmy.ca

The article is about Mike Johnson and the house.

7
fodderohreply
lemmy.world

In the narrowest reading of the article, maybe. But as I said the House already passed their bill. It is in the Senate's hands now. But since the Senate requires a supermajority, they need some level of Dem support to pass it. And since anything the Senate passes would have to go back to the House for reconciliation, House leadership is very much involved in those negotiations (or lack thereof) since they would have to line up support in their own chamber. And that is what the article is talking about. Not just the House, but the negotiations as a whole and Johnson's part in it. (Or refusal to participate as seems to be the case.)

7

He has the votes to pass it in the house, it's more so the senate Republicans who have to negotiate with the senate Democrats to pass it.

2

So, can the serial bankrupt businessman bankrupt a country? Sure that would be the big beautiful bankruptcy this time!

14

He’s a Republican. They live to lick boots. They can’t even sleep if they haven’t licked a boot all day.

18

He's quite far from sainthood himself. Your standards veiled extreme-right persona with many counter-traits just barely out of sight

13
lemmy.world

What parts of the government are still operating and getting paid? Let me guess, military and police?

9

You have FBI, DEA, Secret Service, and of course ICE which are all federal.

5
minorkeysreply
lemmy.world

I have no idea but law enforcement and military don't just stop doing the job because Congress shuts down. So...if those groups still function, and everything else stops, would republicans care? The stuff they value most still operates.

2

They're up against a payday cliff. 1st and 15th for military IIRC.

There are several reasons to end a government shutdown prior to your security not being paid. Imagine all the ICE bullshit brigades not getting paid.

They kinda painted themselves in.

4

The federal armed forces will run out of money to pay people soon. Those ICE losers shouldn't be paid anyways so fine with me

3

mike closeted johnson, pedaling trumps message is actually making people more likely to read up on the epstein files.

6

They really don't want the public to have proof the pedophile currently stinking up the white house is a pedophile...

4

You reached the end