I can see this community is very much crickets but maybe someone would have some insight...

If pCloud has a facility in Austin, TX USA - then its EU storage ain't shit for privacy because of the US CLOUD Act, right?

Why would anyone pay more when the vulnerability is built into the company? Or am I reading that wrong?

CLOUD Act says even if the EU protects the user data privacy because it's stored in the EU, if the company storing it is US based and/or if the company storing it has facilities also in the US, that leaves them open to subpoena.

Thoughts?