Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.zip

8 replies

ISOmorphreply
feddit.org

I know it's a pipe dream, but what if WhatsApp chooses to not compromise their encryption either. You'd have chat control but no chatting. Would be kinda interesting to see.

8

WhatsApp is owned by Facebook. They will whine and do whatever makes them the most money at any particular time.

16
literature.cafe

I hear you about going back to analog. The problem in the States is that Republicans have managed to gut the postal service and drive up its prices so that normal people can’t afford it. Electronic communication is all they can afford.

PGP encrypts and decrypts locally. Your private keys never leave your device. Public keys are meant to be shared widely, but without the private key, anyone who intercepts the message has exactly a block of encrypted text and no way to read it.

2

No worries. It’s been a while since I saw anyone talking about PGP or GPG (the FOSS version).

I think that the EU would have to ban the entire internet if they banned public key encryption. And that would make their corporations very sad.

2
feddit.org

So, what is everyone's opinion on RCS-Chat? I'm trying it out with a good friend of mine and the functions are so much better, plus (in our case at least) it's e2ee. I especially love the transcribed voice messages, because fuck listening to 3 minutes of blabbering when I can simply read it in a fraction of the time.

4

Yeah, it’s probably the best solution there is (if there would not be a mandatory phone number you have to give) But gatekeepers do what they do best :(. It feels off to advocate for it though after already bringing many to Signal.

It is good to have an alternative, but having to need one would also mean that it’s has been already compromised by the EU. :)

2

You reached the end

Head of the Signal app threatens to withdraw from Europe | Spyke