Spyke
piefed.social

An actual honest to God mistake. I'm surprised.
I was fully expecting this to be malicious on the part of the current administration.

Tldr: She requested her records a few years ago, and those were the same files released recently by mistake. Clerk messed up, thats all.

48

what exactly in the article do you think proves it was an honest mistake and not a deliberate act?

11

Yeah, it helps understand how it happened. They submitted the request and there was a typo, then they called

And I'm sure the call started with an introduction that tipped off the fact that he was helping with a Republican political campaign, and the "very helpful" clerk gave out privileged information gleefully.

This is the environment created by Trump and doge. This is why they do the loyalty tests and fire people illegally through emails.

This is what it looks like when you politically weaponise the state

Bullshit it was an accident - it was one person breaking procedure after months of the president calling for exactly this

4
EtherWhackreply
lemmy.world

People in those departments deal with classified info where they can't make those types of 'mistakes'.

30

The documents included Sherrill's Social Security number, which appears on almost every page, home addresses for her and her parents, life insurance information, Sherrill's performance evaluations and the nondisclosure agreement between her and the U.S. government to safeguard classified information.

Oh cold cruel Irony.

47
lemmy.world

Suckers and losers, amirite?

(I'm a veteran, too, and that shit grinds my gears)

44
lemmy.world

What could be in mil records that would be disadvantageous for her? Wouldn’t that just compromise ongoing mil missions?

3
dhorkreply
lemmy.world

Well, her full SSN, for one thing. The article says they redacted everyone else's SSNs but not hers.

26

She added: "That Jack Ciattarelli and the Trump administration are illegally weaponizing my records for political gain is a violation of anyone who has ever served our country. No veteran's record is safe."

9

a technician did not follow standard operating procedures for releasing records, and should only have released portions eligible under FOIA rules.

This really seems like the kind of thing that should have more than one point of failure, no?

4

a wing of the National Archives and Records Administration

From a quick google search.

tl;dr

Doged
3% of staff layed off in June 2025
Voluntary separation incentives
Trump fired Archivist of the United States Colleen Shogan in February 2025 and replaced her with Secretary of State Marco Rubio
specific cuts targeting staff who respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

::: spoiler AI Summary with touchups, emphasis mine
Reports of cuts at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in 2025 relate to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a program established by the Trump administration. These cuts include staff layoffs, leadership changes, and proposals for significant budget reductions in the coming fiscal year. [1, 2, 3]

Staffing reductions and reorganization

• Layoffs: In June 2025, NARA began laying off nearly 100 employees, representing about 3% of its staff. Many of these job losses affected probationary employees and staff at presidential libraries, leading to at least one temporary library closure. Critics warned that these reductions would harm public-facing services.
• Leadership changes: President Donald Trump fired Archivist of the United States Colleen Shogan in February 2025 and replaced her with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who became the acting archivist. This raised concerns about the politicization of the agency.
• Voluntary separation: The agency mitigated some layoffs by offering voluntary separation incentives. [1, 3, 4, 5]

Impact on services
• Hindered mission: Former archivists and experts warned that the cuts would weaken NARA's ability to provide access to records and prepare for an influx of digital data.
• Threats to accessibility: Public records and historical integrity are at risk, with specific cuts targeting staff who respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. • Damage to historical preservation: Critics say cuts targeting preservation of contemporary records will "imperil scholarship" and reduce accountability. [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]

Budget proposals
• Fiscal Year 2026: A proposed budget would cut NARA's funding by nearly $60 million from projected 2025 levels. This 10% reduction would target operating expenses and eliminate 136 full-time positions.
• Focus on electronic records: The proposed 2026 cuts would disproportionately affect the Electronic Records Initiative (ERI), reducing its funding by 33%. Experts warn this could hinder the government's transition to fully electronic record-keeping. [3, 8, 9, 10]

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2025/06/trump-administration-resumes-layoffs-targeting-national-archives-staff/406112/
[2] https://americanoversight.org/as-doge-cuts-harm-millions-americans-are-denied-basic-information-about-the-agency/
[3] https://federalnewsnetwork.com/budget/2025/06/former-archivist-raises-red-flags-over-nara-cuts/
[4] https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2025/03/19/tracking-the-trump-administrations-attacks-on-libraries/
[5] https://action.everylibrary.org/nara2025
[6] https://federalnewsnetwork.com/budget/2025/06/former-archivist-raises-red-flags-over-nara-cuts/
[7] https://www.opb.org/article/2025/04/03/public-records-offices-gutted-in-hhs-layoffs/
[8] https://eogn.com/page-18080/13512724
[9] https://fundnara.com/naras-budget
[10] https://federalnewsnetwork.com/budget/2025/06/former-archivist-raises-red-flags-over-nara-cuts/

:::

4

You reached the end