Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

11 replies

FR. Fines need to be based on at least double what the misconduct earned them.

3
aussie.zone

I caught his coverage of the fine yesterday on 9 news, he pointed out that their share price actually rose afterwards, so the fine didn't really hurt them in any way.

2
vasreply

Well the share price could've risen due to expectations of a worse judgement. The analysis has to be a different one. Just profit/loss.

1

I'm in this class action. I've been paid $236.81. Yay, I guess?

I was truly hurt when this happened to me 20 years ago, but now $236.81 goes nowhere near as hard. The most egregious thing ANZ did would be to take my account(s) into negative balance with fees, and then charge me $36 overdraft fee per account on going negative - then charge me daily compound interest on each negative balance until I realised that my account was in the red through actions that weren't my own and costing me heavily.

While I recognise that I'm in a far better place financially to when this happened, this payment feels token at best. I don't even remember what this number represents in terms of what damage was done to me as a percentage. But I'm moderately certain I lost more money than this to ANZ fees at the time than I've been compensated for.

5
aussie.zone

I should really change to Bank Australia at some point, but I can't be bothered unless Visa cracks and allows LGBT content again (I'm currently on Mastercard).

3

They're the only bank in my town that isn't for-profit. I just need the initiative.

Come to think of it I don't actually care about my issue with Visa and Mastercard very much. I should just ignore it and go with the better bank.

1

In ten years we have had major fines of ANZ, Westpac, CBA. Next is National Bank?

1

You reached the end

‘Betrayed the trust of Australians’: ANZ bank pays record $240m fine for widespread misconduct | Spyke