Too little, too late. They, along with every other corporate media outlet, are so desperate to be first to publish that they'll happily pour gas on the wildfire.
The person the Guardian used as a source was almost certainly a Utah Republican. Eager to find a scapegoat, and willing to lie to avoid any reflection or accountability. The British Guardian was too credulous.
The Guardian was caught posting propaganda, and were forced to retract it.
Just more nazi billionaire bullshit: "All the left are your enemies! No compromise, no surrender, fight until you die or they're all dead!" That's their goal, that's their propaganda.
All the far-right extremist terrorists have already heard their message, no amount of retraction can get that programmed propaganda out of their minds. They already felt the hate for the left, from the propaganda. They don't want to feel bad for listening to a bad news source, so it's just a plot by the left - and that generates more hate.
Too little, too late. They, along with every other corporate media outlet, are so desperate to be first to publish that they'll happily pour gas on the wildfire.
The person the Guardian used as a source was almost certainly a Utah Republican. Eager to find a scapegoat, and willing to lie to avoid any reflection or accountability. The British Guardian was too credulous.
The Guardian was caught posting propaganda, and were forced to retract it.
Just more nazi billionaire bullshit: "All the left are your enemies! No compromise, no surrender, fight until you die or they're all dead!" That's their goal, that's their propaganda.
All the far-right extremist terrorists have already heard their message, no amount of retraction can get that programmed propaganda out of their minds. They already felt the hate for the left, from the propaganda. They don't want to feel bad for listening to a bad news source, so it's just a plot by the left - and that generates more hate.
and yet the headline persists...